Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Why RVIVR? And Why Revivalism?

We’ll admit it – we fell in love with the name of this site for goofy, tech-geek reasons. It’s a palindrome, obviously, as a lot of web property names are, and it’s lacking some letters.

Of course, our love was prompted in no small part by necessity. Since the theme of this site is American revivalism, as expressed in the brand-new book The Revivalist Manifesto by RVIVR publisher Scott McKay (pre-order it here), the obvious name for the site would be REVIVER.

But we’re way too far along in the development of the internet to pick up that domain name for a song. So we got a little creative, and chopped out the “E’s.”

But why revivalism? Well, it’s simple – because conservatism isn’t enough anymore.

If you’re a fan of Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, or of Bernie Sanders and AOC, a warning – this is not the site for you. In fact, we have a lot to say that will trigger you. We think your policy preferences are destructive and anti-American, and we’re not like those submissive old Republicans who are anxious to compromise with you.

We’re different. We come from conservatism, but we’re moving forward from it.

Conservatism seeks to defend the status quo. We struggle to find anything in the current state of America that we’re satisfied with. We don’t conserve, we revive.

We need something new. We need, essentially, conservatism on offense.

Most of 21st-century America is so divorced from the ideals of our founding, a reality few in this country demanded but is nonetheless the case through a combination of deception, incompetence, sloth and corruption, that to conserve it would be a disservice to the movement which bears its name.

We don’t need or want to conserve America. Not as it is. America as it is either elected Joe Biden or came close enough to give his handlers a chance to steal an election. And America as it is made Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi the most important legislators in the country – and for a time Gavin Newsom and Andrew Cuomo our most consequential state-level elected officials.

Conserve that? No.

What we need is to revive America. We need to push back the frontiers of incompetence and treason which have encroached upon our liberty and prosperity, and we need a reflowering of the cultural, economic and political patrimony our forebears gave us.

Ben Franklin said he gave us “a Republic, if you can keep it.” Conservatism took up the standard of keeping it, and then proceeded to surrender all of the important fights.

Instead, let’s build a new movement on the successes of conservatism while learning from and rejecting its failures.

Let’s call it Revivalism, because we need to revive what’s been lost amid the cultural, economic and political aggressions of our enemies foreign and domestic.

What are the tenets to build this on? Well, The Revivalist Manifesto discusses them in detail, but here are four with which to start the discussion.

First, civilization is meant to make it easier to earn a living than steal one, which requires just enough government to accomplish that purpose and no more. As soon as you introduce too much government you have given the pillagers an easier road to plunder than they could ever have through violence.

And we have far, far too much government.

Our people know that we’ve lost our way. We know that things like the recent nonstop COVID fear porn, the caterwauling about a January 6 protest which was far less violent or threatening than hundreds of other riots sanctioned by our political and cultural ruling class, and never-ending inflationary government giveaways are merely symptoms of the real disease; we are both oppressed by and dependent upon the State, and it has made us less as people.

Government, in the American model we seek to revive, is meant to be merely a tool to insure liberty and security from villains and enemies.

As such, Revivalism states a specific goal of making the freest possible America for law-abiding citizens. We’re for few laws, vigorously enforced.

Second, our government is not and should never be seen as representative of the people. Rather, it is representative of the interests who have access to government. Some of those interests are popular, but most are not. President Eisenhower’s famous warning about the corruption inherent in the formation of the military-industrial complex was more prescient than he could have ever realized; far from limiting that complex’s scope we’ve seen conservatism embrace it, leading to terrible effect in Afghanistan and Iraq, and worse, the military-industrial complex has metastasized and spread. We now have a medical-governmental complex and a media-political complex which are every bit as corrosive as the defense lobby ever was.

Therefore the State must be limited in its powers and the Revivalist project is to pursue every avenue possible to make it irrelevant, not to give it more influence over our lives. Particularly at the federal level, but Big Government exists in states and localities, too.

But that doesn’t mean we’re for abandoning our fellow man to the streets. We’re for providing social goods to the helpless. Maybe not so much to the gormless and the clueless, but too many Americans have fallen through the cracks and need lifting up and we’re absolutely for doing so.

This is hard stuff, of course, because what it requires is the building of communities through engagement and activism. It requires service to one’s fellow man. It requires nurturing and championing the civil society – churches, men’s clubs, labor unions, bowling leagues, pot-luck dinners and the rest.

You’ve undoubtedly noticed the diminution of these things. The gay and trans lobbies, among others, have destroyed the joy in forming and growing them, and now our political elite demonizes them as “super-spreaders” of the COVID virus or, in the most extreme idiotic cases, of “white supremacy” and other evils. The people in power want us on our phones living our lives on social media that they control.

Revivalists demand a return of community, and we demand that government get the hell out of our way.

Third, politics is downstream from culture, but politics has built a boat with a powerful motor. Further, politics corrodes everything it touches, and it has corroded our culture almost completely.

As culture is the foundation of society, it must be protected from those who would use it to tear us apart. Without winning that war, which conservatism sadly has never invested in doing, all will eventually be lost.

Revivalism demands that the Right engage in defending American culture, which we all recognize when we see it, specifically to elevate it beyond the touch of politics.

What does that mean? It means producing cultural content with a level of activity at least that of the Left, it means reviving beauty in the arts, and it means breaking and replacing those cultural institutions which have so clearly failed us.

Schools. Universities. Hollywood. Corporate media. Professional sports, if it won’t get the message.

Start locally and move up from there. Let’s write novels and plays. Let’s be funny again. Let’s never be canceled. And let’s show the world that freedom is a lot more fun than wokeness.

And let’s spare no mercy for the woke. Let’s lustily subject them to all the ridicule, all the loud rejections, all the withering scorn we can summon up. Conservatism is not up to the challenge of wokeness. But revivalism is.

Even James Carville says that “wokeness is a problem,” and yet the conservative movement Is currently a hodgepodge of caution, cowardice and quiet acceptance of all the key elements of wokeness. Some conservatives are, like collaborators with the SS in Nazi-occupied Europe, turning on their ideological brethren in the hope they might be eaten last. Others have modulated their speech in hopes of avoiding notice. Virtually none have been courageous enough to stand up to the woke mobs.

Revivalism says it’s not good enough to silently hope that the woke fever will burn itself out. Revivalism brings the torch and the gasoline and demands the woke submit to an examination along the lines of their own standards. Revivalism insists that free speech, and the liberty to peacefully disagree without undue intimidation, return with a vengeance.

Finally, prosperity, or access to it, must be shared by all or it is illusory. The Revivalist project seeks to reopen the American and global economies to competition by independents and startups and to fight back against oligopolistic corporations. It’s a capitalist but anti-corporate philosophy.

We can defend low tax rates for billionaires on a philosophical basis all day long, but frankly it’s a loser of an idea to defend Mark Zuckerberg or Jeff Bezos’ income. Conservatives have done that, and what has it got them? The occasional think-tank donations with strings attached to push for open borders and cheap labor? Section 230 protection allowing them to play censor without consequences? Open monopolistic abuses bought-up Republican politicians are busy defending? Lucrative consulting contracts for Frank Luntz from the Sacklers of killer-opioid fame?

Conservatives have let themselves be defined as defenders of America’s worst actors. Our elites make the robber barons of old look like angels, and they’re all Democrats now anyway.

Revivalism offers a fresh start and a chance to stand with the American people against those elites who have foisted this dystopian 21st century upon us. Conservatism’s key mantra, the one William F. Buckley so famously offered of standing athwart history, yelling “Stop,” is and has always been wrong. The project isn’t to stop history, it’s to bend it in the direction we want.

Let’s start over and demand better. Let’s be unafraid and let’s fight to win.

Let’s be revivalists. And let’s revive America.