Wednesday, September 28, 2022
Share:

Shut Off The Spigot And Let DOJ Wither And Die, Right Now



Every word of DOJ’s explanations for the Mar-A-Lago raid reeks of bullshit.

Every word.

It seems the DOJ has decided to leak an explanation of their decision to use a search warrant in this case. Newsweek just published an exclusive report based on anonymous DOJ sources which claims the FBI had a confidential source at Mar-a-Lago, one who informed them that Trump was hiding documents and even specified where they could be found.

The raid on Mar-a-Lago was based largely on information from an FBI confidential human source, one who was able to identify what classified documents former President Trump was still hiding and even the location of those documents, two senior government officials told Newsweek.

Before we go any further, remember that the FBI apparently brought along a safe-cracker who opened Trump’s safe. Presumably that suggests they were told by their confidential source that there were documents hidden in the safe. But by all accounts there was nothing in the safe and the FBI didn’t take anything from it. Does that mean the confidential source got it wrong?

The story also says the raid was intentionally timed to occur when Trump would not be there. Apparently the FBI thought this would lower the profile of the raid. But the DOJ source admits this didn’t work as planned. His explanation here is basically we’re not politically corrupt just dumb.

FBI decision-makers in Washington and Miami thought that denying the former president a photo opportunity or a platform from which to grandstand (or to attempt to thwart the raid) would lower the profile of the event, says one of the sources, a senior Justice Department official who is a 30-year veteran of the FBI.

The effort to keep the raid low-key failed: instead, it prompted a furious response from GOP leaders and Trump supporters. “What a spectacular backfire,” says the Justice official.

“I know that there is much speculation out there that this is political persecution, but it is really the best and the worst of the bureaucracy in action,” the official says. “They wanted to punctuate the fact that this was a routine law enforcement action, stripped of any political overtones, and yet [they] got exactly the opposite.”

The story also appears to settle some speculation that has been circulating since Monday. According to Newsweek’s sources, this was purely about documents sought by the National Archives and “had nothing to do with the January 6 investigation.” In other words, this wasn’t a 9-dimensional-chess attempt to gather documents about Jan. 6 which could be used for future prosecution. It wasn’t about the specific contents of the documents at all. The story also describes a grand jury which concluded several months ago that there was evidence Trump had violated the Presidential Records Act.

A bit more: it’s patently obvious that this was intended for maximum political effect, in other words a provocation of Trump supporters in hopes that someone would take the bait and escalate to political violence which could then create the crackdown the Biden regime has been hoping for an opportunity to kick off since Jan. 6, 2021.

But it was only a week or so ago that a US attorney decided to go to a Florida judge to seek a search warrant. The judge agreed and the FBI began planning the search for a time when Trump would not be there. The story points to the FBI’s focus on a few specific areas as proof they knew where to look. But curiously this story doesn’t mention the June meeting between investigators and Trump’s lawyers when they looked through some of the documents kept in a basement storage room. In other words, the DOJ didn’t need a secret source to know the documents were kept in that particular room because they’d seen them there themselves and, at the time, not taken them.

The story concludes with another big revelation. It claims that AG Merrick Garland was being updated on the National Archives investigation and knew about the grand jury but did not approve the search Monday. Newsweek’s source claims Garland had “no prior knowledge” of the time of the raid. Instead it was FBI Director Christopher Wray who approved the search. Finally, the source adds, “It really is a case of the Bureau misreading the impact.”

And the judge is an anti-Trump partisan who should never have heard the case. Not to mention he’s up to his ears in Jeffrey Epstein connections.

And the FBI refused to give Trump a copy of the search warrant. Presumably it didn’t specify that they could go through Melania’s wardrobe and rifle through her clothes, which they did.

Trump’s lawyer was shown a copy of the warrant from 10 feet away.

There is a continuing resolution which funds DOJ which will come back up for a vote on September 30.

It’s time for Morphine Mitch McConnell and the Senate GOP to show some backbone and filibuster that CR. Deny any funding to DOJ until…

1. A special prosecutor is appointed to look into Hunter Biden’s and his father’s influence-peddling activities;

2. Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray resign; and

3. A bipartisan commission is convened to study and recommend a complete restructuring of all federal law enforcement agencies with an eye toward consolidation and limitations on jurisdiction.

DOJ as currently constituted does far more harm than good. Defunding it and shutting it down for six months or a year would be healthy, as it would allow states some space to reclaim their constitutional police powers.

As such there is no downside to killing that CR.

Call your senators and suggest the get started on this. If we demand it loudly enough, we’ll find the 40 Republicans we need to shut this monster down.