Friday, September 20, 2024
Share:

You Were Warned Wisconsin, Protasiewicz Is Already Up To No Gouda



There are just some things that I will never understand.

In April of this year, a vote was held in Wisconsin to replace a retired state Supreme Court justice. The retired justice was a conservative, leaving the court tied at three justices apiece. The election would break the tie and either return the majority to conservatives or allow liberals to take control.

On March 27th, prior to the election, I wrote a column about the liberal candidate, Janet Protasiewicz. The title of the column was, โ€œDonโ€™t Do It Wisconsin, Janet Protasiewicz Is A Plague That Your State Doesnโ€™t Need.โ€ Here is part of that column. It illuminated exactly how liberal Protasiewicz is and offered fair warning about what electing her would mean.

Protasiewicz canโ€™t hide from her ultra-liberal stance on crime. As a Milwaukee County Judge, her light sentencing exposed her as the true danger to the public that she is.

In 2017, Jovian Reese, who was 18 at the time, invited his cousin to spend the night at his home. After she had fallen asleep, Reese proceeded to rape her. The cousin awoke during the assault and ran to her sister for help. Although Reese denied the allegations, his DNA was discovered on his cousinโ€™s breasts and her DNA was found on Reeseโ€™s penis.

In March 2019, Reese was sentenced for third degree sexual assault. Although he could have been sentenced to up to ten years, Protasiewicz sentenced him to only 14 months in prison and fifty hours of community service.

At the sentencing, Protasiewicz seemed indifferent towards the victim. Telling Reese:

โ€œMr. Reese, I am giving you the least amount of time I think is appropriate. It is significantly less than what I thought I was going to give you.โ€

She then added:

โ€œAre you a danger to the public? I donโ€™t think so. I mean I donโ€™t think you did anything other than engage in a crime of opportunity and hopefully youโ€™ve learned your lesson.โ€

Now, Iโ€™m not a lawyer, although recently I have been enjoying the original Perry Mason series on Paramount+. However, Reese invited his cousin over and then waited until she had fallen asleep to attack her. That doesnโ€™t seem like a crime of opportunity. To me that seems clearly premeditated.

Then in September 2020, Kenneth Wright who was 28, pled guilty to third degree sexual assault for kidnapping and raping a 15-year-old girl. Wright then continued the relationship and eventually ended up impregnating the girl.

At his sentencing, Wright was indignant and blamed the 15-year-old and her parents, refusing to accept any responsibility. In spite of his obnoxious and belligerent attitude, Protasiewicz unbelievably sentenced him to no jail time.

Instead she sentenced a child rapist to 5 years of probation, stating, โ€œBut for covid, I would be giving you some House of Correction time. These are strange times Mr. Wright; Iโ€™m not going to do that.โ€

As in so many of these instances when liberals fail to honor the rule of law, the end results were tragic. Just 10 months after Wright should have been imprisoned, he was involved in a drunk driving crash. He was arrested on October 16, 2021, after rolling his vehicle. At the time he was traveling in excess of 80 miles per hour in a 30 mile per hour zone. During the crash, his passenger Jamera Doyle was ejected from the vehicle and pronounced dead at the scene.

In September of 2019, Iraida Pizarro-Osario took her son to the Sixteenth Street Health Center. The child was 16 years old yet weighed only 42 pounds. He was so emaciated and his muscles so deteriorated that his bones were clearly visible. When the boy arrived he was unresponsive and had only a faint pulse. Sadly, in spite of the best efforts by clinic personnel and first responders, the child past away at the center.

The Medical examiner determined that the boy had died from severe malnutrition and Pizarro-Osorio pleaded guilty to felony neglect of a child.

At her sentencing on November 25, 2020, Pizarro-Osorio was originally sentenced to four years in prison and four years of extended supervision. However, Protasiewicz then stayed that sentence and placed Pizarro-Osorio on probation for only four years.

Recently, there have been accusations made about Protasiewicz outside of the courtroom. In an interview last Wednesday night with โ€œWisconsin Right Nowโ€ (WRN), Jon Ehr, a former Milwaukee restaurant/bar owner, adamantly repeated that he personally witnessed Janet Protasiewicz physically abuse her elderly husband and heard Protasiewicz use racial slurs in a โ€œderogatoryโ€ fashion about Blacks and Hispanics, including the โ€œN word.โ€

Maddenโ€™s son, Michael Madden, also told both WRN and the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he saw Protasiewicz physically assault his dad and heard her use the โ€œN word.โ€

Both men claim to have seen injuries on Judge Maddenโ€™s face that were caused by Protasiewicz, who at the time was a prosecutor. The men allege that the abuse took place around 1997, when Protasiewicz was 34 years old and the judge was then 70 years old. The ill-fated marriage only lasted nine months.

Itโ€™s clear that Protasiewicz does not belong on the Wisconsin State Supreme Court. Her judgement is tainted to the extent that only her agenda will be administered to any cases she reviews. Justice and fairness will never be considered and everything will be weighed against her ultra-liberal views.

Wisconsin voters didnโ€™t listen. Instead, they sentenced themselves to a ten-year term of liberal madness by electing Protasiewicz. Naturally, it didnโ€™t take long for them to get a taste of what they have to look forward to.

Protasiewicz, was just sworn in last Tuesday giving the liberals control four to three. So what was their first order of business? They went behind the backs of the other three justices and fired the director of the state courts, Randy Koshnick.

Thatโ€™s right, they never even consulted with the other three justices. They just took it upon themselves to fire Koshnick without cause, since there had been no complaints against him. An action which raised the ire of Chief Justice, Annette Ziegler.

“The court’s action today violates the Wisconsin Constitution which endows the chief justice with administrative authority. The authority of the chief justice is being undermined and eroded unlike any time in this court’s history. This lack of respect for longstanding institutional process is reckless.”

“A vote of four may dictate decisions of our court, but those votes are taken during formally noticed court conferences scheduled by the chief justice; no such conference has occurred. Apparently, several of my colleagues do not think court conferences are necessary to conduct court business when there is a pre-ordained determination. Their actions today effectively silence those members of the court who have not been privy to these secret discussions.”

“The unauthorized action taken today by some of my colleagues firing Director of State Courts Randy Koschnick is flawed procedurally, legally, and on its merits. As chief justice, I contemplated actions I might take to attempt to stop this unauthorized action, but given my colleaguesโ€™ reckless conduct, other court employees would also become victims of this unauthorized action.”

Ziegler went on to further denounce the actions of the four by pointing out that the decision was made:

“without regard for the Constitution, case law, or supreme court rules which address who can fill such a position of public trust, and what is the rush? What is the purpose of doing such an unauthorized action as the first order of business for the 2023-24 term? I have not been made aware of any urgent issues that would require the immediate removal of Director Koschnick.” My colleagues’ unprecedented dangerous conduct is the raw exercise of overreaching power. It is shameful.”

OK, we all know that Marxist Democrats think that rules are for everyone else, but them. So what is Ziegler going to do about it? Judging from her statement, โ€ฆ not much. I think she needs to explain what she meant when she said:

โ€œAs chief justice, I contemplated actions I might take to attempt to stop this unauthorized action, but given my colleaguesโ€™ reckless conduct, other court employees would also become victims of this unauthorized action.”

Huh?

This is such a Republican response. I thought about doing something, but I wonโ€™t. When will conservatives learn that you canโ€™t just allow liberals to do whatever the hell they please. Their arrogance is disgusting, and to do nothing about this is clearly telling them to do it again.

You were warned Wisconsin, and you didnโ€™t listen. Donโ€™t compound the mistake by rolling into the fetal position every time the left challenges proper authority.

You canโ€™t be a doormat unless you lay down. Start standing up, get used to it and learn to enjoy it.