Reporting of Antisemitism, Anti-Israel Bias Gets Short Shrift From Media
On the morning of Oct. 21, a 40-year-old synagogue president in Detroit named Samantha Woll was found stabbed to death outside her home. It appeared she had been attacked inside, and stumbled outside before being discovered the next morning.
In the wake of the horrific Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attack in Israel, it was inevitable that people would conclude antisemitism was at least a potential motivation. But the police chief knocked that down almost immediately.
In fact, the lack of evidence for it being a hate crime was the specific way the national press treated the story on the day after she was found. โNo Evidence of Hate Crime Has Emerged in Killing of Synagogue Leader, Officials Say,โ was The New York Times headline, but it was far from alone.
We also learned, by the following day, that police were โjust shortโ of naming a person a suspectโan indication they knew a potential motive, and the reason they were able to swiftly rule a โhate crimeโ was out of the equation. The story then essentially disappeared from the headlines.
That was on Oct. 23. More than two weeks later, no suspect has been identified or arrested. Thanks to a local Detroit outlet that has stayed on the case while the national press has moved on, we know the police donโt appear to have any real leads, eitherโat least not that theyโre discussing publicly.
In this article, it appears one of the pieces of evidence for it not being an anti-Jewish hate crime in the first place was that a โlarge Israeli flag in Wollโs home โฆ was left untouched, which indicated to them that this likely wasnโt an antisemitic-driven attackโโa sentence that quite literally makes no sense to any rational observer of crime, โhateโ or otherwise. (A great Commentary piece from Abe Greenwald put the story back on my radar last week.)
Perhaps Wollโs killing had nothing to do with her occupation or religion. But we certainly have not seen anything to prove that. And yet the story has evaporated. The Samantha Woll coverageโor lack of coverageโis just a single example of a disturbing trend Iโve witnessed in the month since Oct. 7.
I try to stay fairly emotionless when covering the media, and Iโd like to think I generally succeed. Iโm finding it more and more difficult to do that over the past month.
Itโs not just that Iโm JewishโIโd like to think Iโd feel the same way if I wasnโt. But the coverage has been so disappointingโand deleterious.
Sure, thereโs the overt antisemitism from some on the Left and Right. Thatโs almost easy to dismiss. Then there are the more subtle examples that we see bubble up throughout the press.
And then thereโs the almost willful ignorance on Israel, Hamas, Gaza, and our own American antisemitism problem. The Woll story fits that category. The national media disappeared it from the headlines. Having it occupy space in the national discourse would disrupt the preferred narrative. So, they took the policeโs wordโa common problem on all sorts of stories when it comes to the pressโand moved on.
Or take the continued reliance by our corporate media on the โGaza Health Ministryโ to provide accurate data on how many have been killed in the fighting between Israel and Hamas. Itโs a constant, from the way the press was spun in the โhospital bombingโ story to more recent examples. Outlets like The Associated Press and The Washington Post have gone out of their way to try to justify their reliance on the Hamas propaganda.
Are they simply lying to themselves, or do they know better? And if theyโre lying to themselves, isnโt it obvious to the public that they will lie to you, too? Itโs a topic I addressed in a recent column for The Hill, centered on the woefully botched Gaza hospital story, and the continued fallout from so many in the press that want to continue the lie that Israelโand not Hamasโtargets civilians.
But in this moment, I err on the side of knowing. I want to see all the antisemites in America reveal themselves, whether they work in media, in government, on college campuses. We shouldnโt censor them. As I wrote in another column for The Hill, let the antisemites speak freely, so we can adjust accordingly.
Iโve adjusted. I see the industry differently nowโthe cowardice, and the hypocrisy. We donโt have to get into an argument about whether itโs antisemitism or just simply anti-Israel sentiment to be instinctively distrustful of everything Israel says and immediately trusting of Hamas, or to see an Acela Media situated where antisemitism is quite obviously prevalent every time a bratty kid rips down another hostage poster barely cover the rise of this hatred in our country.
Whatever the motivations, or incentives, we have seen rationality abandoned by the press, in favor of placating those who wish Israel simply did not existโin story after story over the past month.
A quick story. Billionaire George Soros is a political lightning rod, and Iโd argue one of the more misunderstood figures by those who love and loathe him. And whenever heโs criticized for some progressive left-wing policy or action, the antisemitism charge ultimately is invoked.
In a fascinating, and disturbing, โ60 Minutesโ interview in 1998, Soros revealed how he hid his identity as someone who was raised as a โHungarian Jewโ by pretending to be a Christian in Nazi Germany, actually stealing from the Jews in order to keep up the facade. In that same interview, Soros was asked if he believed in God, and he answered no. โI believe God was created by man, not the other way around,โ he said.
Soros is an atheist. He was raised Jewish, but heโs not Jewish. Similarly, imagine if you were raised as a vegetarian, and yet now, as an adult, you eat burgers and bacon and any other sorts of meat. No one would still call you a vegetarian. Being Jewish is not an immutable characteristic, like your race or ethnicity. (Some would argue against that being immutable, too.)
Well, Iโm sure weโve all heard the trope that Jews control the media. After this month? I guess not.
Reprinted with permission from Fourth Watch.