DEI Danger Hits Critical Mass With “Queering Of Nuclear Weapons”

What happens when radical leftists jumble DEI, racism, and LGBTQ ideology into the mix of nuclear weapons and warfare? The short answer is nothing good. The accurate answer is an imminent disaster.

I’ve said this many times, and I will say it again: the concept of DEI is nothing more than a new name for quotas. It is strictly based on skin color, ethnicity, and alternative lifestyles but does not represent merit in any way, shape, or form. DEI is essentially geared toward hiring or promoting anyone as long as they are not white heterosexuals. Therefore, it is racist and heterophobic to its very core.

The Biden-Harris regime has facilitated this disease of hatred by publicly endorsing this sickness as well as hiring other zealots into positions of authority. Who can forget luggage thief Sam Brinton or Pete Buttigieg, who decided it was more important to pretend to be breastfeeding during a shipping crisis than to show up for a job he was never qualified for?

 In February of this year, the Biden-Harris administration appointed Sneha Nair as special assistant to the National Nuclear Security Administration, who, according to Fox News, has made no secret of her claims of white supremacy and her love of Marxist ideologies.

In 2023, while serving as a research analyst with the Nuclear Security Program at the Stimson Center, a nonprofit that received funds from the U.S. State Department, United Nations, Lockheed Martin, as well as the governments of numerous foreign nations, and George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, Nair wrote a paper that stated:

“Finally, Queer Theory informs the struggle for nuclear justice and disarmament.”

“Queer Theory helps to shift the perception of nuclear weapons as instruments for security by telling the hidden stories of displacement, illness, and trauma caused by their production and testing,” she went on while arguing DEI “is essential for creating effective nuclear policy.”

In April 2023, she said:

 “By understanding DEI as a set of values critical to security, and therefore as an element of an effective nuclear security culture, stakeholders can explore how DEI can contribute to stronger security at nuclear facilities.”

“Collectively, these principles (of DEI) can work to mitigate counterproductive work behavior and prevent disgruntled employees from becoming insider threats. DEI principles and advancement must be considered crucial assets for strengthening nuclear security implementation.”

Nair openly states that, in her simple-minded opinion, if predominately white people man nuclear facilities, nuclear security suffers. This is a blatant falsehood, and that statement alone should have cost the loss of her position. However, she wasn’t done with her presumptive racist rhetoric.

“U.S. government reports show that qualified applicants with foreign ties have been discouraged from applying to sensitive national security positions and faced barriers to obtaining a security clearance. This is in part due to preconceived confirmation biases held by investigators about certain racial or ethnic groups.”

“Considerable progress has been made in advancing DEI in the nuclear field, but the largest obstacle remains in ensuring that nuclear security practitioners understand how DEI can serve as a tool to strengthen nuclear security,” she argued. “Greater focus on the intersections between nuclear security and DEI is essential.”

Nair had also attempted to weave her unfounded concern of “domestic violent extremist groups and homegrown violent ideologies” while calling for a change to nuclear security norms.

She naively referenced the happenings at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, as a basis for her voiced concerns about “flaws in a system designed to weed out unsuitable candidates for sensitive work protecting nuclear materials, weapons, facilities, technology, and personnel.”

Fox News cited this outrageous claim made by Nair when again she blamed everything on white supremacy.

“An example of this is the threat posed by some White supremacist groups to nuclear facilities may go undetected if a White-majority workforce does not perceive these ideological leanings as indicators of a relevant nuclear security threat.”

“The queer lens prioritizes the rights and well-being of people over the abstract idea of national security, and it challenges the mainstream understanding of nuclear weapons–questioning whether they truly deter nuclear war, stabilize geopolitics, and reduce the likelihood of conventional war.”

This is an extremely perilous issue. Nair and those like her are LGBTQ and DEI-biased racist zealots. They make outrageous, baseless claims that the left is foolish enough to entertain.

The very idea that a person in her position would even suggest that national security would be enhanced by viewing it through a lens of perversion is reason enough to justify her dismissal.

How long will the public stand for these blatant attacks on normalcy? The alternative lifestyle of those in the LGBTQ community is theirs to choose, but to demand that it be accepted by everyone and to insist that it infiltrate every aspect of American lifestyle, including our national defense procedures, is ludicrous.  

Nair is delusional and dangerous. Other countries are laughing at our indulgence in this type of nonsense. They watch our nation rot from the inside out and wait patiently as we fall into the darkness.

Our enemies would love to see a Harris-Walz victory, and that should tell you all you need to know.