Under Gov. Tim Walz, Babies Born Alive in Botched Abortions Were Left to Die. Then He Removed Reporting Requirements
As Democrats and media outlets accuse former President Donald Trump of dramatizing the Democratic abortion agenda, data from the Minnesota Department of Health shows that at least eight babies who survived abortions in the state were left to die.
Under a 2015 Minnesota law, the state formerly was required to report whether abortions resulted in the live birth of a baby, what actions were taken to preserve the life of that baby, and whether the baby survived.
Those reporting requirements exposed that between Jan. 1, 2021 and Dec. 31, 2021, physicians performed five abortions that resulted in a babyโs live birth.
The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now
No measures were taken to help the first baby, who reportedly had โfetal anomaliesโ that resulted โin death shortly after delivery.โ Two of the babies were given โcomfort care measuresโ as they died. No measures were taken to โpreserve lifeโ of the last two babies, who were previable.
Previous data from the Minnesota Department of Health reveals that physicians have been leaving babies to die after failed abortions for years. In 2020, no babies were reported born alive through botched abortions, according to the Minnesota Department of Health.
But between Jan. 1, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2019, three abortions resulted in born-alive babies who were then allowed to die. The first baby reportedly had โfetal anomaliesโ but also had โresidual cardiac activityโ for two minutes, yet no efforts were taken to preserve that babyโs life, and โthe infant did not survive.โ
The second baby died while โcomfort care measuresโ were provided. The third baby was previable and did not receive any attempts to preserve his or her life.
It does not appear that any of the babies born alive in botched abortions survived.
Due to efforts by the stateโs Democratic governor, who served from 2019 until the present, Minnesota will no longer even keep track of born-alive babies.
Tim Walz, the new Democratic vice presidential nominee, repealed the bipartisan measure in May 2023, stripping the stateโs requirement that measure be taken to preserve the babyโs โlife and healthโ and merely replacing it with a nebulous requirement for โcare.โ
Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris has refused to specify any limitations on abortion or protections for unborn babies that she would support, indicating that her campaign does not, in fact, support any restrictions on abortion.
When Trump has pointed out that some states leave babies to die after birth, stating, โHard to believe, they have some states passing legislation where you can execute the baby after birth,โ outlets like CNNย rate such claimsย as โfalse,โ writing: โNo state has passed or is passing a law that allows the execution of a baby after it is born.โ
The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
โPost-birth abortion is real and Harris-Walz support it,โ tweeted The Heritage Foundationโs Roger Severino. โAt least 5 babies were born alive after botched abortions and left to die under Walzโs watch. Two of these struggling babies were given โcomfort careโ instead of medical care allegedly in violation of state law.โ
โHow did Walz respond?โ he continued. โBy repealing the very law exposing and outlawing this horror and replacing it with abortion-on-demand on the front end, and infanticide on the back end.โ
In January 2023, Walz signed a broad abortion law that included no limitations on how late during pregnancy a mother may end the life of her unborn baby.
โTo Minnesotans, know that your access to reproductive health, and your right to make your own health care decisions, are preserved and protected,โ Walz said then of the Protect Reproductive Options Act. โAnd because of this law, that wonโt change with the political winds and the makeup of the Supreme Court.โ
The legislation reads: โEvery individual has a fundamental right to make autonomous decisions about the individualโs own reproductive health, including the fundamental right to use or refuse reproductive health care.โ
โReproductive health careโ is a euphemism for abortion.
Tyler OโNeil contributed to this report.