Thursday, November 14, 2024
Share:

Under Gov. Tim Walz, Babies Born Alive in Botched Abortions Were Left to Die. Then He Removed Reporting Requirements



As Democrats and media outlets accuse former President Donald Trump of dramatizing the Democratic abortion agenda, data from the Minnesota Department of Health shows that at least eight babies who survived abortions in the state were left to die.

Under a 2015 Minnesota law, the state formerly was required to report whether abortions resulted in the live birth of a baby, what actions were taken to preserve the life of that baby, and whether the baby survived.

Those reporting requirements exposed that between Jan. 1, 2021 and Dec. 31, 2021, physicians performed five abortions that resulted in a babyโ€™s live birth.

The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now

No measures were taken to help the first baby, who reportedly had โ€œfetal anomaliesโ€ that resulted โ€œin death shortly after delivery.โ€ Two of the babies were given โ€œcomfort care measuresโ€ as they died. No measures were taken to โ€œpreserve lifeโ€ of the last two babies, who were previable.

Previous data from the Minnesota Department of Health reveals that physicians have been leaving babies to die after failed abortions for years. In 2020, no babies were reported born alive through botched abortions, according to the Minnesota Department of Health.

But between Jan. 1, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2019, three abortions resulted in born-alive babies who were then allowed to die. The first baby reportedly had โ€œfetal anomaliesโ€ but also had โ€œresidual cardiac activityโ€ for two minutes, yet no efforts were taken to preserve that babyโ€™s life, and โ€œthe infant did not survive.โ€

The second baby died while โ€œcomfort care measuresโ€ were provided. The third baby was previable and did not receive any attempts to preserve his or her life.

It does not appear that any of the babies born alive in botched abortions survived.

Due to efforts by the stateโ€™s Democratic governor, who served from 2019 until the present, Minnesota will no longer even keep track of born-alive babies.

Tim Walz, the new Democratic vice presidential nominee, repealed the bipartisan measure in May 2023, stripping the stateโ€™s requirement that measure be taken to preserve the babyโ€™s โ€œlife and healthโ€ and merely replacing it with a nebulous requirement for โ€œcare.โ€

Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris has refused to specify any limitations on abortion or protections for unborn babies that she would support, indicating that her campaign does not, in fact, support any restrictions on abortion.

When Trump has pointed out that some states leave babies to die after birth, stating, โ€œHard to believe, they have some states passing legislation where you can execute the baby after birth,โ€ outlets like CNNย rate such claimsย as โ€œfalse,โ€ writing: โ€œNo state has passed or is passing a law that allows the execution of a baby after it is born.โ€

The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

โ€œPost-birth abortion is real and Harris-Walz support it,โ€ tweeted The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Roger Severino. โ€œAt least 5 babies were born alive after botched abortions and left to die under Walzโ€™s watch. Two of these struggling babies were given โ€˜comfort careโ€™ instead of medical care allegedly in violation of state law.โ€

โ€œHow did Walz respond?โ€ he continued. โ€œBy repealing the very law exposing and outlawing this horror and replacing it with abortion-on-demand on the front end, and infanticide on the back end.โ€

In January 2023, Walz signed a broad abortion law that included no limitations on how late during pregnancy a mother may end the life of her unborn baby.

โ€œTo Minnesotans, know that your access to reproductive health, and your right to make your own health care decisions, are preserved and protected,โ€ Walz said then of the Protect Reproductive Options Act. โ€œAnd because of this law, that wonโ€™t change with the political winds and the makeup of the Supreme Court.โ€

The legislation reads: โ€œEvery individual has a fundamental right to make autonomous decisions about the individualโ€™s own reproductive health, including the fundamental right to use or refuse reproductive health care.โ€

โ€œReproductive health careโ€ is a euphemism for abortion.

Tyler Oโ€™Neil contributed to this report.