C’mon Scam-A-La, There Is No “Joy” In Swampville

If you read Scam-A-La’s press, you would think that everywhere she appears, a sunburst erupts behind her, bathing everyone in the room in the warm sunshine. Rose petals fall at her feet, and the room spontaneously bursts into song and dance.

Then you realize that the only things the administration she was a significant part of has brought to our country are pain, desperation, worry, division, and hatred. The MSM knows that, too, but they have been reduced to trained seals that mimic each other in many cases word for word. Really, it’s sickening to see how far the media has fallen. It has been evident for years now that the left controls the major news outlets, and as each story breaks, they are given a script to follow. The observation that journalism is dead is no longer something clever to say. It’s a cold, hard truism that journalism isn’t only dead; it’s buried in an unmarked grave.

Scam-A-La’s non-stop cackling, non-sensical word salads and irrelevantly flamboyant hand gestures needed to be addressed, so the string pullers decided to paint her childish insanity as her being joyful. They want to try to convince the voters that she is so filled with joy that, if elected, it would then transcend throughout her policies.

The truth is that Harris is definitely full of something—but it isn’t joy. She is so weak and incompetent at everything that she can’t subtly try to disguise her flip-flopping on every significant issue facing our country.

Earlier this week, former GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy clashed with CNN anchor Kate Bolduan over Vice President Kamala Harris’ policy reversals.

Ramaswamy contended that the media did not expose voters to Harris’ far-left record.

“Voters have not yet been exposed, principally by the media, to what Kamala Harris’ past positions actually are. I don‘t blame the voters. They‘ve been served up a new version of Kamala Harris, where she is running to the center on economic and social policies. But the reality is, if we‘re able to use Kamala Harris‘ own words against her, as I believe we should, she ran for president favoring tax on unrealized capital gains, favoring ‘abolition’ — her words — to abolish private health insurance, a ban on fracking, bans on offshore drilling. These are the kinds of policies that absolutely are not mainstream for most Americans.”

Bolduan defended Harris’ changing positions, stating that she clarified to CNN’s Dana Bash last week that she no longer supports a ban on private health insurance or fracking. Then, typically, she tried to project Harris’s issues onto Trump.

“Those are not her positions. If evolving on an issue… you can even call it flip-flopping on an issue if that is now not allowed if that should be the death knell to a campaign, Donald Trump‘s got issues.”

Ramaswamy then correctly pointed out that Harris had not simply “evolved” from her past far-left views on several issues but was also distancing herself from policy actions she had taken throughout her political career. He told Bolduan:

“Actions speak louder than words.”

“She said she didn‘t favor a ban on fracking now; the reality is, she was one of the strongest proponents of that ban, so much so that when she was in California, she sued the Obama administration over granting fracking permits. She didn‘t just favor the abolition of private health insurance. She was a co-sponsor of the bill with Bernie Sanders as a U.S. senator for ‘Medicare-for-all.’ The reality is, when you think about the Green New Deal, she was the chief proponent, not just as a co-sponsor of the legislation, but going further and saying she would end the filibuster in the Senate to ram that through. So, the reality is she can say what she wants to say now; those are actions she has taken.”

“Is someone allowed to evolve?” Of course, they are, but she deserves to explain exactly why she‘s changed those positions. Exactly what her position is. If it‘s not a ban on fracking, what exactly is it? What exactly is her health care plan if she no longer favors abolishing private health insurance? Just four short years ago, when she ran for president, she did. That’s the kind of scrutiny that‘s been missing.”

Other assertions made are that Harris “does not support an electric vehicle mandate.”

However, back in 2019, Harris co-sponsored a bill that would have mandated automobile manufacturers to produce only electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles, completely phasing out gas-powered ones that most Americans depend on by 2040.

To sum up, Harris, the Democratic party’s “appointed” candidate, could have much power if elected. She is now trying to gain political advantages by publicly giving up on unpopular and impractical stances through press releases. However, when asked about her new positions, she is unwilling to provide any details. For instance:

“I don’t support an electric vehicle mandate, but I just might sign one into law.”

Harris’s doublespeak is bold but not entirely devoid of political value. With the support of the MSM, she believes, perhaps rightly so, that she can have it both ways.

Harris’s refusal to discuss substantial issues is a blatant attempt to hide her shallow intellect. She can’t answer serious questions because she is clueless on all matters, and she knows that if she is elected, someone else will tell her what to do, and she, like Biden, will be a puppet.

This gravitation towards the center is a ruse. The left will never turn away from the radical changes they want for American society. Harris and the Democratic party are only capable of feeling contempt for all of us. On November 5th, let’s return the favor.