There are Two Kamalas, but Which One Would be the President?

Who is Kamala Harris?

That is a question the Harris campaign hopes to avoid, but one the Trump campaign must insist she answer.

Over the weekend, I saw a brilliant new Trump campaign ad that features Harris debating herself. On one screen, somber Harris talks about how terrible the economy is for ordinary folks. She admits bread and ground beef are up 50%, and people are hurting. She acknowledges that rent, food and back to school clothes are all very expensive. Yet, her old self on the second screen answers with, “Bidenomics is working!” In the last exchange, New Kamala says, “It feels so hard just to get ahead.” Instantly, Old Kamala snaps back, “We’re very proud of Bidenomics.”

Perfect.

If the Trump campaign can stick to the script and continues to crank out ads that are simultaneously humorous and deadly like this one, he will energize a campaign that has grown a bit stagnant. The challenge is to stay away from the personal attacks and focus exclusively on “outing” the two Kamalas.

Positionless Empty Pant Suit

Kamala is a chameleon, who has embraced a strategy of purposeful ambiguity. She dodges a friendly media, and much like the Changelings in Star Trek, she adapts to the area, culture and mannerisms in an effort to mimic the locals.

This ability was in full display in recent campaign stops, where her exact same stump speech was delivered in two entirely different accents, each pandering to the respective local attendees.

This disturbing tendency for Harris to morph from one personality to another coincides with her extreme policy shifting based on poll numbers, and apparently, whatever she is being told to say. The list of her policy doublespeak is extensive.

* Fracking: In a 2020 CNN interview, Old Kamala said this about fracking: “There’s no question I’m in favor of banning fracking. And starting with what we can do on Day One around public lands, right? And then there has to be legislation, but, yes, and this is something I’ve taken on in California. I have a history of working on this issue and to your point, we have to just acknowledge that the residual impact of fracking is enormous in terms of the health and safety of communities.”

However, in a recent interview, New Kamala had this to say on the subject: “No, and I made that clear on the debate stage in 2020 that I would not ban fracking, as vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking.”

* Border Wall: For many years, Old Kamala was a consistent critic of Trump’s border wall calling it “stupid,” “useless,” and a “medieval vanity project.”

However, New Kamala feels differently. In fact, in her acceptance speech at the Democratic convention in Chicago, Harris said she “supports policies to secure our border”, including border legislation that contains $650 million for new border wall construction.

Asylum: Throughout her pursuit of political power in California, Old Kamala repeatedly confirmed she would “honor the process” of asylum for illegal aliens crossing the border. In 2018, Harris signed onto an amicus brief filed by a nonprofit on behalf of illegal aliens challenging a Trump administration rule that barred the aliens from claiming asylum outside ports of entry. Further, she called restricting illegal aliens from entering the country “a stain on our moral conscious.”

New Kamala wants to take a different approach to asylum for illegals. When asked about the subject, Harris’s campaign manager said she would continue implementing Joe Biden’s plans to curb asylum, which include executive orders that bar aliens from crossing the border once a daily threshold has been reached. 

I could go on, but you get the drift. Whether it’s the economy, defunding the police, the border, fracking, electric vehicles or a myriad of other subjects, Old Kamala and New Kamala are diametrically opposed to each other. The tortured morphing of policy, personality and even accent are so cringe worthy and dishonest it’s difficult to believe that ordinary Americans aren’t going to question Harris’s character and ability to do the job.

Dependent Personality Disorder

Harris’s pattern of embracing both sides of virtually every issue is troubling enough, but morphing into a completely different person while reading the same speech in front of two different crowds is truly disturbing.

People pleasing, which Harris clearly suffers from, is a very undesirable personality trait because a president must be the strongest willed and self-assured person in every room he/she walks into. Yet, changing her personality and accents in order to win favor leads one to wonder if she doesn’t have a more serious clinical condition, such as Dependent Personality Disorder (DPD).

Does Kamala Harris need approval so badly that she will say or do anything to gain favor with whoever she is interacting with? Here is a description of someone with DPD:

“These individuals seek support and approval, and therefore cannot express opinions or disagreement, especially with those they are dependent on. They feel so unable to function alone that they will agree with things that they feel are wrong rather than risk losing the help of those to whom they look for guidance. Individuals with this disorder find it difficult to initiate projects or work independently.”

Throughout his presidency, many political analysts expressed concern that Joe Biden was not truly in charge of running the government due to his progressive dementia, and instead, a shadowy group of “handlers” was actually calling the shots. A person with even mild DPD would be a perfect foil and substitute for these back-room power brokers. It appears like Harris is functional to the extent she can present herself as self-aware and in control, but behind the scenes, she may be completely dependent on others for direction and guidance on every decision of importance.

In light of what we learned about Joe Biden’s mental competency, I believe the apprehension surrounding Harris’s unusual shape shifting is a legitimate concern. Something is wrong with a person who has absolutely no foundational belief system and can change their positions and personality to mimic the general vibe of a crowd.

Kamala Harris is an empty pant suit who is a puppet to her masters.

You want that kind of person holding the nuclear codes? Do you want Harris’s shadowy handlers holding them?

You better think long and hard when you’re filling out your 2024 ballot.