Kamala Harris is an Empty Vessel, but Who will fill the Blank Space Between Her Ears if She is Elected?

By now, it should be painfully apparent to anyone following the 2024 election that Kamala Harris is an empty vessel.

If you doubt this truth, answer these questions:

How does Harris plan to address the deficit and the trillion dollar a year interest on the debt?

Or…

Border security?

The Ukraine proxy war?

The fentanyl crisis?

The violent crime explosion in major cities?

The assault on free speech?

The coming social security bankruptcy?

The auto and home insurance crisis?

The balance between fossil fuel energy production and climate change?

The burgeoning China military threat?

See, you have no idea where she stands on these issues even after four years as vice president, the second most important position in the country.

The list of unanswered questions is extensive. Perhaps worse, the policies she has actually developed, including price controls, a $50k tax deduction for small business, and a free $25k grant for first-time homebuyers, all demonstrate a stunning lack of comprehension of basic economics.

The Empty Vessel

The empty pantsuit image of Harris is reenforced by her consistent and mind-boggling word salad answers.

More recently, she has adopted this bizarre habit of assuming an accent she thinks will align with her audience.

In total, the lack of policy specificity, the word salads to avoid honest answers, and the strange accent changes to pander to different audiences, all confirm what most people suspected about Harris from the day she was picked by senile Joe Biden as his vice president. Harris is a DEI hire who has no core principles or deep foundational beliefs. Throughout her career, she has used each position as a stepping stone to get to the next. It has never been about doing the hard work that would leave things better than she found them. That part is inconvenient. It’s the trappings of the job she craves. The validation that she is somebody who matters.

When you approach your career that way, developing a belief system becomes an impediment.

Who will be Harris’s Handlers if She wins?

That may work for Harris, but what does that mean for the country?

As Aristotle said, “nature abhors a vacuum,” so you can guarantee there are plenty of people just off stage left who will be ready to fill Harris’s empty head with ideas that mostly benefit themselves and their warped view of what’s best for the country. If you want to see the future of America under Harris, look at the politics of her handlers.

The question is, who are those people?

Reed Hastings: Netflix co-founder. He contributed $7 million to the Harris campaign or its super PAC surrogates.

Agenda: Hastings is a supporter of charter schools, providing $200 million in support for expanding school choice. He donated $120 million to black colleges and universities. More recently, Hastings has donated to NGOs focused on racial issues and criminal justice.

Reid Hoffman: LinkedIn cofounder. He contributed $8.7 million to the Harris campaign or its super PAC surrogates.

Agenda: Hoffman funded a nonprofit, American Future Republic, that was responsible for paying legal fees for E. Jean Carroll’s bogus civil suit in which she accused former President Trump of raping her. Hoffman was active in the 2022 midterm elections, focusing on races where his money could “weaken the political power of the anti-American Trump-MAGA movement.” Interestingly, Hoffman is a vocal critic of radical progressive Democrats, who he sees as an impediment to Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.

Melinda French Gates: Bill Gates ex-wife: French Gates received around $11 billion in her divorce settlement with Bill Gates. She has contributed anywhere from $13-52 million to the Harris campaign and its super PAC surrogates.

Agenda: Melinda French Gates champions women’s causes, including spending $1 billion on systemic problems facing girls and women, including mental health, physical health, gender equality and reproductive (abortion) rights.

Bill Gates: Founder of Microsoft. Bill Gates has donated roughly $50 million to the Harris campaign and its super PAC surrogates. Interestingly, Gates’ donation came late in the campaign as it appeared Harris was beginning to lose momentum.

Agenda: Gates champions a variety of causes, including AIDS & HIV, ALS, animals, at-risk/disadvantaged youths, children, disaster relief, education, environment, family/parent support, health, homelessness, human rights, hunger, world peace, physical challenges, poverty, water, climate change, atmospheric manipulation and childhood malnutrition.

Lauren Powell Jobs: Steve Jobs wife. Lauren Powell Jobs received an $11.5 billion inheritance from the death of Steve Jobs, founder of Apple. Powell Jobs has contributed at least $1 million to the Harris campaign and its super PAC surrogates.

Agenda: Powell Jobs is passionate about amnesty for illegal aliens, natural foods and abolishing the death penalty.

Bloomberg LP: Bloomberg LP is owned (88%) by Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg LP has donated $19 million to the Harris campaign and its super PAC surrogates.

Agenda: Bloomberg’s agenda includes abortion, immigration reform, gun safety, the economy, climate change and personal integrity. Bloomberg also has a visceral hatred of President Trump.

What to Expect in a Harris Presidency

We’ll never know exactly what motivated Joe Biden, who was absolutely committed to running in 2024 despite the dementia, to drop out of the race. However, it’s more than possible that the influential people on this list made the decision for him. In today’s political environment, money rules, and the best-case scenario for wealthy leftists is a president who has no core beliefs. Biden fit the bill in 2020, but in 2024, his dementia was so obvious, his chances of winning were severely diminished. That made Harris a better choice.

For Biden, the message was probably very clear. No money, no campaign.

Under Harris, expect a push for amnesty for illegal aliens (Bloomberg and Powell Jobs), strict climate change regulations (B. Gates), a lot of money for women’s issues (M. Gates), de-emphasis of progressive leftists (Hoffman) and a focus on identification and appearance politics (Hastings).

Whatever important issues she faces, rest assured decisions won’t be made until Harris gets the okay from her very influential handlers.