Sunday, April 20, 2025
Share:

Did President Biden Make Fires Worse at the Beck and Call of an Environmentalist Group?



As fires ravage the Carolinas and South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster declares a state of emergency, I remember how my brother and I spent long, hot summers in rural Colorado, cleaning up dry brush and dead wood to protect our mountain home from fires. My father, a volunteer fireman, taught us the importance of forest management from a young age, because it was essential to protect us from harm.

For this reason, I was horrified to learn that President Joe Biden had issued an executive order that might prevent this forest clearing in the name of protecting โ€œold-growth forests.โ€ Rather than allowing for the three strategies to prevent forest firesโ€”targeted logging, controlled burns, and cleaning brush from the forest floorโ€”his administration promoted a top-down bureaucratic approach that might have contributed to some of the horrific wildfires Americans have suffered in California and the Carolinas this year.

โ€œThe Biden administration unquestionably diverted time and energy away from addressing the overwhelming wildfire and forest health crisis that is the true threat to forest stands of every age class,โ€ Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., told The Daily Signal.

Westerman, who chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, warned that โ€œmismanagement of our forests can have dire consequences.โ€ However, he promoted the bipartisan โ€œFix Our Forests Act,โ€ which he claimed will โ€œhelp land managers address this issue head on.โ€

The issue has taken on renewed importance amid devastating fires on both coasts. In January, major fires like the Palisades Fire and the Eaton Fire burned more than 47,000 acres of land in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. California released new statewide fire maps that show 1.4 million acres of land in high and very-high risk zones, up from roughly 800,000 in older maps. At least 29 people have died in the fires.

Meanwhile, South Carolinaโ€™s governor declared a state of emergency amid the Table Rock Fire in the Blue Ridge Mountains on Saturday. As of Wednesday morning, the fire, which started Friday, has burned an estimated 2,293 acres. Meanwhile, the Black Cove Complex Fire and the Deep Woods Fire had burned an estimated 6,000 acres by Tuesday evening in Western North Carolina, the same region devastated by Hurricane Helene.

What Did Biden Do?

Biden issued Executive Order 14072 on Earth Day, April 22, 2022. The order, โ€œStrengthening the Nationโ€™s Forests, Communities, and Local Economies,โ€ ordered federal agencies to create an inventory of โ€œold-growth forestsโ€ and strategies to preserve them. Where did his administration get this idea?

Climate activist groups like the Natural Resources Defense Council had urged the administration to โ€œembrace a bold new vision for forest protection.โ€ Among other things, the NRDC claimed that โ€œmature, old-growth, and intact forests and trees have unparalleled, irreplaceable value for the climate and biodiversity, with intact forests storing 30-70% more carbon than logged forests.โ€

Climate alarmists claim that burning fossil fuels will bring about worsened conditions across the globe, but their predictions have repeatedly failed. For instance, Al Gore predicted that there would be no snow on Mount Kilimanjaro by 2020, but it continues to snow on the mountain in Tanzania. Climate alarmists like Biden have claimed that climate change has made hurricanes worse, but the science and data donโ€™t bear that out.

Even if increasing levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere poses a problem, that must be balanced alongside important considerations like the economic value of wood and the prevention of forest fires.

The Forest Service published regulations implementing Bidenโ€™s order in December 2023, and the NRDC urged its members to engage in the public comment period, backing the regulations. As I noted in my book, โ€œThe Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government,โ€ the NRDC had close ties to the Biden administration and it hired multiple Obama administration staff to lead the organization, including former EPA head Gina McCarthy.

Among other things, the regulations called for โ€œproactive stewardship activitiesโ€ to โ€œpromoteโ€ the โ€œamount, density, and distribution of old trees, downed logs, and standing snags.โ€ In other words, the regulations call for prioritizing the prevention of the clearing of the forest floor, which is vital for mitigating the spread of wildfires.

After Trump won the 2024 presidential election, the Biden administration revoked the regulations. The NRDC did not respond to The Daily Signalโ€™s request for comment by publication time.

Enabling More Fires

Tim Oโ€™Hara, president of the Forest Resources Association, praised the withdrawal of the regulations, but noted that the executive order may have had a lasting negative impact on Americansโ€™ ability to prevent fires.

โ€œThe uncertainty surrounding Bidenโ€™s executive order and its potential restrictions on forest management may have delayed management decisions that would have provided timber to the market and further mitigated wildfire risks,โ€ Oโ€™Hara told The Daily Signal.

โ€œManaging our national forests across the U.S. is simply not a one-size-fits-all approach,โ€ he added. He said forest management is best handled at the local level, โ€œwhere unique forest conditions, including recreation, wildlife habitat, and timber production, can be addressed directly.โ€

โ€œOver the past three decades, the management of federal forest lands has led to significantly higher tree mortality rates than nonfederal landownerships,โ€ he noted. โ€œThese elevated mortality rates contribute to increased fuel loads, which have led to more intense wildfires.โ€

Nick Smith, who handles public affairs at the American Forest Resource Council, warned that poor forest management and restrictions on logging worsen the risk of forest fires.

โ€œOur federal forests are unnaturally overgrown, and as a result, they are dead and dying and fueling todayโ€™s megafires,โ€ he told The Daily Signal.

โ€œBidenโ€™s political and self-defeating push to save โ€˜old growthโ€™ made it much more costly and bureaucratic to properly manage national forests,โ€ Smith added. โ€œSince he signed the โ€˜Earth Dayโ€™ executive order in 2022, the Biden administration hamstrung the Forest Serviceโ€™s ability to implement forest projects that would reduce the risks of wildfires and toxic smoke.โ€

โ€œIt absolutely had a chilling effect on the timber industry,โ€ he added. โ€œTimber harvests on federal lands, which had been increasing since the Obama era, declined while Biden was in office.โ€

Smith argued that Bidenโ€™s executive order โ€œlaunched a process that consumed agency staff and resources that should have been devoted to addressing the growing forest health and wildfire crisis.โ€ He noted that the proposed regulation would have โ€œsimultaneously amended all 128 Forest Plans across the nation at once, adding more red tape to forest management and transferring decision-making from local public lands managers to political appointees in Washington.โ€

Forest Service Data on Fires

Smith also cited Forest Service data showing that โ€œtree-cutting effectsโ€ are associated with more wildfire resilience among old growth forests.

โ€œSince 2000, over 700,000 acres of old growth forests have been destroyed in severe wildfire, and another 182,000 acres to insects and disease,โ€ he noted. The Forest Service found that 400,000 acres of old growth experienced โ€œtree-cutting effects,โ€ and on 92% of those acres, the tree cutting improved or maintained conditions for the forests, improving wildfire resilience.

โ€œForests in areas reserved from active management, such as wilderness areas, have seen greater losses of old growth than forests where limited timber harvest is allowed,โ€ Smith added. โ€œIn contrast, old growth forests actually increased on managed forests where logging is allowed.โ€

The Forest Service did not respond to The Daily Signalโ€™s request for comment by publication time.

MOG-Threats-Intro Final Jan 2024Download

The federal government should encourage forest management, not regulate it out of existence in a wrongheaded top-down climate alarmist approach. Logging, brush-clearing, and controlled burns are essential to keep fires in checkโ€”and itโ€™s long past time the federal government stopped getting in the way of local forest management.