Every Time We Make Something Idiot-Proof, Blue States Build A Better Idiot

At this time in our nation’s history, leftist idiocy is running wild. Senators, governors, mayors, and judges nationwide in blue states are primarily responsible for the madness. One of the most demented states where stupidity originates is, of course, California, and they are now offering up another brainless idea.

Sheriff Chad Bianco of the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office (RCSO) shared a video on social media explaining how a new bill introduced in the California State Assembly could effectively “make self-defense against criminals” illegal.”

Assembly Bill 1333 was introduced by Assembly Member Rick Zbur of Santa Monica on February 21st and aims to:

“eliminate certain circumstances under which homicide is justifiable, including, among others, in defense of a habitation or property.”

On the California Legislative Information Website it states that the bill specifies that homicide is:

“not justifiable when a person uses more force than necessary to defend against a danger.”

I can already see red flags. If your property is under attack, how are you supposed to judge what the intruder intends to do? Therefore, the line in the bill that states homicide is “not justifiable when a person uses more force than necessary to defend against a danger” is deliberately left open for interpretation. In a liberal state like California, the victim can quickly become criminal.

Sheriff Bianco understands this stating:

“For more than a decade, the leadership in Sacramento has literally tied the hands of law enforcement, and made it almost impossible for us to protect you. Now, they’re coming after you and your ability to protect yourself.”

In his video, Bianco emphasized that the bill would:

“Tie the hands of residents while coddling criminals. If a criminal attacks you or your family and you defend yourself and that criminal dies as a result of his criminal behavior, you could be arrested and charged for murder. You have a constitutional and God-given right to protect yourself. You actually have that right under California law.”

Bianco announced his candidacy for governor in February and has been critical of Governor Gavin Newsom’s actions while in office. He made his announcement alongside supporters and other elected officials. Bianco is one of the most prominent candidates vying for the Governor’s Office in 2026, joining current Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

The event celebrating Bianco’s leadership featured a notable divide among attendees. His supporters applauded his positions on various issues, while protesters gathered outside to express their dissent. Many believe that Bianco has become a polarizing figure in the region. Inside the venue, his supporters praised him for standing firm in his principles, while outside, protesters voiced their opposition to his views and leadership.  

Supporters claim that Bianco represents the majority’s beliefs, while critics argue that his actions and statements render him unfit to serve the community. 

Really? He is unfit, but Newsome and the other radical Democrats are?

One fact that explains California’s constant state of turmoil is that a Republican has not occupied the Governor’s Mansion since Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006, and the party has not had a member in statewide office since 2011.

In response to criticism regarding the proposed bill, Assembly Member Zbur attempted to clarify its intent by stating on X:

“AB 1333 was never meant to restrict a crime victim’s right to defend themselves, their family, or their home. The goal is to prevent individuals, like Kyle Rittenhouse, from provoking violence and then claiming self-defense afterward. We will amend the bill to make this absolutely clear.”

Zbur is an obvious liberal that wants to pass a law that turns victims into criminals. Using Kyle Rittenhouse as an example is a glaring sign of that. Perhaps someone needs to remind Zbur that Rittenhouse was acquitted and that the circumstances of that case were exceptional in that the shooting took place at an unlawful riot where Rittenhouse was not one of the protestors.

Defense attorney Mike Wise, who has worked on homicide cases for decades, believes that the bill could complicate self-defense decision-making for jurors.

“Having tried a lot of homicide cases over the last 30 years, this is the kind of legislation that might sound good in a classroom, but it is not going to help jurors making critical decisions.”

Wise also questioned the bill’s necessity, stating that California’s current self-defense law is straightforward and effective.

“That law has stood the test of time. It is common sense, and it makes sense to jurors. This modification really overcomplicates it, and I do not think it is going to fly in a courtroom.”

This law would be used against innocent victims who find themselves having to protect their lives, homes, cars, or other property against thugs whose intentions are unknown. This is the type of law where Democrats will deny it will be used in that manner … until it’s passed. Then it will be used to martyr innocent gun owners, who find themselves in dangerous situations that they didn’t initiate.

This is nothing more than another leftist encroachment on civil rights. No surprise that it originated on the left coast in California.