
No Free Speech, No Free Trade
The UK, in many ways, is unrecognizable as a nation from its former self. Their immigration problem may be as bad as ours was under Biden, and they are making no effort to stem the flow. Their country has not only been invaded, but their very culture is being overrun. Their do-nothing snowflake leaders and ridiculous liberal laws have sentenced their citizens to a special type of hell.
One case that has recently garnered the attention of the Trump administration involves Livia Tossici-Bolt, a 62-year-old grandmother who opposes the killing of innocent children. She is being prosecuted for standing silently outside an abortion clinic in Bournemouth while holding a sign that said, โHere to talk if you want.โ
Reports indicate that the U.S. State Department is closely monitoring her case. President Trump has informed British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that a free trade deal between the U.S. and the United Kingdom may be at risk. Trump has specifically told Starmer that the trade deal depends on the UK addressing concerns regarding free speech, explicitly mentioning the Tossici-Bolt case.
The warning from the Trump administration comes as Starmer, like many other leaders, scrambles to protect their countries from Trump’s tariffs, which may at the very least strain the British economy.
Hardly a criminal, Tossici-Bolt is a retired medical scientist who was charged in February with violating a Public Spaces Protection Order after standing near the Bournemouth abortion clinic.
This action violates the senselessly arbitrary 150-meter buffer zone set by the UK government last October to limit protests near abortion clinics. No other business is protected by such a random and clearly leftist, imbecilic law.
Her trial began on February 17 and has attracted international attention, with pro-life advocates and free speech activists supporting her cause. The Alliance Defending Freedom UK, which is representing her, argues that her sign was a peaceful offer of support rather than a protest. They further argue that her prosecution infringes on her rights to free speech and free expression.
The U.S. State Department released a rare statement expressing concern about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. They went on to say that this case could influence bilateral relations between the two nations.
Trump, who prioritizes protecting free speech in his administration’s foreign policy, reportedly rejected Starmer’s last-minute request for additional time to negotiate an exemption from the tariffs.
Starmer downplayed the tension when speaking to reporters, stating that the UK is engaged in intense negotiations with the U.S. to prevent a trade war.
โWeโre not rushing into anything,โ he stated, entirely dodging questions about whether the Tossici-Bolt case could obstruct any agreement. Tossici-Bolt pleaded not guilty to the false charge, asserting that her presence outside the abortion clinic was an act of compassion.
โI just wanted to have a conversation,โ she told supporters outside the courtroom. The stakes are high not just for Tossici-Bolt, but for both nations.
The British Office for Budget Responsibility has cautioned that a full-blown trade war sparked by Trumpโs tariffs could reduce the UKโs GDP by 1 percent.
Trumpโs tariffs aim to create a more balanced environment for U.S. trade. In the case of the UK, it is hoped that a friendโs concern for free speech will encourage its leaders to reflect inwardly and address some of the issues affecting what was once a great nation. This nation is losing its cultural roots and the determination to safeguard the God-given right to free speech.