BEYOND SOUTH AFRICA: You’re Not Supposed to Notice That—But What If You Did?
In Part 1 of this two-part series, we followed Trump into forbidden territory: white South Africa. Not as a diplomatic overture, but as a narrative provocation. By simply sharing a video the media and most world leaders wouldn’t dare acknowledge, Trump forced a conversation about racialized violence, selective outrage, and the moral hypocrisies of global diplomacy. He made the media say the quiet part out loud.
He made them say the word–genocide.
Not to mention that favorite tell for a lie seeker–“baseless.”
But genocide wasn’t the only story he cracked open.
Because beneath the obvious story—Trump daring to mention white victims—another layer stirred. One that stretches past South Africa, past Israel, and directly to America’s own collapsing border.
It is a problem more conservatives have talked about, obviously, but we must continue to grow in our understanding of exactly why the Zionist/Cultural Marxist dynamic at play for the last 125 years remains so relentless in pushing it.
READ PART 1: TRUMP & SOUTH AFRICA: You’re Not Supposed to Say That—So He Did
The second narrative Trump disturbed is immigration. By invoking white South African genocide, he re-energized the argument that demographic replacement is not merely an economic or cultural issue—it’s a fundamentally existential one. We are going extinct–and it’s not from any South African asylum. And the architects of both deny these phenomena exist with the same breathless insistence….
There is no invasion.
There is no genocide.
“He was a murderer from the beginning,” Jesus said.
RELATED: This is War. This Has Long Been War
Isn’t it convenient that those most invested in erasing national borders are also the loudest to accuse others of genocidal behavior—so long as it’s not their client states being scrutinized?
And isn’t it equally convenient that those “others” can never be questioned, scrutinized, touched?
Convenient, until Donald Trump starts wielding his narrative sword.
Our prior analysis this week of Trump’s strange tightrope walk on Israel—a walk that has left MAGA voters, neocons, and nationalist critics equally unsettled, perhaps even ignoring it all to avoid the cognitive dissonance—provides important context. As we noted–or as we presented through Socratic questioning, a series of starts and stops, plunges forward and hesitations, all mimicking the exercise of real-time cognitive engagement–Trump often allows his allies to stumble over their own contradictions. He doesn’t always strike directly; sometimes, he simply allows the narrative to collide with itself.
Even if that means he has to look like a fool at first in the process. He baits his enemies into mocking him, and in mocking him, they say the unspeakable out loud.
Genocide.
Invasion.
As ‘Ghost of Based Patrick Henry’ notes in his commentary, this was no accident. Trump remained completely engaged during the meeting, and at the right moment, lent his voice to the images on screen. The media had no choice but to report it. And in so doing, they spread the very imagery they had avoided for decades. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa’s government remains under ICJ scrutiny—not just as an accuser of Israel, but now as a defendant in the court of public opinion.
This isn’t diplomacy on Trump’s part. It only masks as that.
It’s jiu-jitsu. It’s surgical. It’s the art of war.
And the deeper irony? By making the press say “genocide” in a new context, Trump did more than trigger a comparison. He flattened the playing field. If South Africa deserves inquiry, so does Gaza. If only certain victims must be discussed and others ignored to protect the narrative, then the narrative itself is racist.
The narrative itself is a lie.
“He is a liar and the father of lies,” Jesus said.
Regarding the news that was plastered all over our electronic screens yesterday, and related to that video–at the very least narratively while not necessarily in fact–the one about a reported antisemitic killing this week, something I addressed directly in Part 1, Chris Paul had this to say:
If you have changed your opinion on Israel and Gaza based on the reported antisemitic killing, then you are exactly the sort of sucker these narrative events target. Are we to pretend these are the sorts of narrative events that are only false flags sometimes?
Who are we, truthers, to only think some things are false flags and only we, because of our state of supposed enlightenment, can tell which ones are while the rest of the time, the TV is telling us the truth?
Too many people have adopted the belief that because they support Republicans and are therefore on the right side of things, all the false flags and psyops are targeting someone else.
Supporting Republicans means you already fell for it. It’s a Uniparty. Democrat and Republican, left and right, red and blue are both trying to hoodwink people for the same reason, ultimately. If you have spent your life obeying them, then you have been hoodwinked.
We have all been hoodwinked before.
Shall we assume they’re only hoodwinking “the other side” because they know we initiated can already see through it, so they’ve stopped trying to pull one over on us? False flags and psyops come from no side but that of the Regime and the Uniparty in this country, but they target absolutely everyone.
The Regime brands the false flags and psyops to Republicans just as they do with Democrats, or however you choose to break it down. Ideas are marketed to everyone, all at once. Every message says, “you’ll get a treat if you convince other people to support us.” The Regime provides daily confirmations that supporting them will be handsomely rewarded and opposing them will be harshly punished, eventually leading to ruin.
The point is not: knowing for certain we’re only getting hoodwinked by the good guys and therefore immune.
The point is NOT GETTING HOODWINKED AT ALL.
When you understand what it means not to get hoodwinked at all, only God remains.
The point is NOT GETTING HOODWINKED AT ALL….
Isn’t it amazing that Charlie Kirk and one of those college kids he “debates” (see Ben Shapiro in 2015) went viral arguing pro-militant Zionism vs free Palestine and then a few short hours later “free Palestine” murdered “innocent Zionists,” therefore militant Zionism is necessary? Therefore, militant Zionism is necessary. And people, in stupor, nod along.
It’s like the Regime scripts and schedules these narrative events! And, of course, they do.
“Both sides” have been fully activated online. Now, you’re forced to choose one side or the other!
Unless you choose neither.
When you choose neither, the trick stops working.
And then comes the reinforcement—from Chris’s intellectual sparring partner, ‘Burning Bright’:
I’ve been arguing for some time that the belief in patriot plans operating on levels and layers we’ll never be able to directly confirm does not contradict the need to move forward in the actualization and codification of our own sovereignty.
That begins in the mind, from which all micro and macro reality spins out.
Trump isn’t “returning power back to” we, the people. He’s telling us it’s there for the taking. All we have to do is reach out and grab it.
Some have forgotten that WE are the power patriots are trying to project. And THEY are the power we are projecting.
Chris Paul never has.
Required reading.
As I’ve been saying, but with my own slant toward Christ and his Church, all of this–all of these Trump deployments, including South Africa, whether he intends it or not–is meant for us.
Us.
Us.
Us.
The following Loomer post concerning the reported killing could be sound analysis. But has the regime earned this unquestioning right to our trust? I’m asking the question. The boys at Badlands are more direct in their snub:
I wish I could quote Chris Paul’s entire article (please read it), but here is another pull before I peel myself away from what is something every American must come to understand:
Imagine, Christians, if Jesus said, “It’s okay to lie if you’re supporting the right political party or just lying to people in order to ‘wake them up,’ based on things you saw online and repeat in order to convince strangers to like you.”
If someone is lying to you, that person is probably not doing so with the intent to wake you up, and the fact that they pretend to be trying is them lying to themselves. If they say they’re lying as part of some plan, whose plan is it?
Is it God’s plan? Is it a plan we can truly claim to understand? Why would we lie on behalf of a plan we don’t fully understand? God was not the one who said, “You have figured it out well enough, you are now free to lie when you determine it’s for a good reason.”
Do I know what really happened with this killing? Do any of us?
Has there not been a pattern adequately established at this point that we might at least take pause at what those pixelated people on the screen are telling us?
How many times has this sort of thing happened and, mere days later, we find out the actual truth about it, but we can’t actually correct the memory-hole because we’ve been shoved into another chapter of the psyop, another round of the memory-holing, another lie that we swear this time is true?
God is waking us up to all of this–the bigger picture, the greater deception. And you can believe that–you can be on ‘that side’ if you must–regardless of whether or not you voted for Trump.
And that is where I veer just a little from the approach of Chris Paul and ‘Burning Bright’. That is where I mark my line in the sand with God and not-God.
Because Trump ain’t God.
Trump the candidate must be separated from Trump the official. He is no messiah or villain for me at this point, but a tool—a sword used in God’s providence, whether willingly or not.
And that is why I caution readers against him–not because I don’t support him. Not because I’m a liberal. Not because I’m a Democrat. Not because I think boys should play in girls’ sports. Not because I’m a terrorist sympathizer.
But because–using the Badlands boys’ very premises–God is the ultimate Truth. Everything else that may be happening is a means to that end, a specter of the ultimate primacy of Source, the Creator, the Father.
We have been lied to so many times before that it should be the default that we not believe what is coming through those electronic screens. Scary to think, perhaps, because how are we supposed to know what is going on, right? But that is where we have to get. It has to become the default and we go from there, not the other way around–where we’re finding out months or weeks or even days later that, duh, we were duped again.
That’s how they memory-hole history on us.
And that’s how they get us to support things–cry a rebel yell for things–that are not at all of God.
Because they’re not the truth.
Escape the binary trap, my friends. Reject mutually exclusive thinking–like true rebels worthy of the name. Dare to see the “pairs” everywhere as a most diabolical false dichotomy with the capture of our minds the temporal and eternal consequence –an image embodied in the character Cypher in The Matrix, featured at the top of Chris Paul’s article.
What if the entire structure of moral judgment has been inverted on purpose?
Do we know that one of the devil’s demons is Baphomet–the master of inversion?
Where do we think the abomination of transgenderism comes from? Where do we think all the lunacy where up is down and down is up comes from?
And what if the devil also has his minions here on Earth–
Just as Jesus said he would.
I’ve realized in the last few years just how literal Christ was being when he said some of the things he said.
Maybe the global stage isn’t just split between colonizer and colonized, but more sinisterly, between predator and prey, between evil and good–between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the Woman. And maybe the moment we start naming both clearly, we can understand that it’s not just our bodies or families or livelihoods in this life that are in danger–but our very souls.
Just as Jesus said they would.
—
May everyone named directly or referenced indirectly ask forgiveness and do penance for their sins against America and God. I fight this information war in the spirit of justice and love for the innocent, but I have been reminded of the need for mercy and prayers for our enemies. I am a sinner in need of redemption as well after all, for my sins are many. In the words of Jesus Christ himself, Lord forgive us all, for we know not what we do.
