Ontario Appeals Court Grants Man A Vagina, Gets To Keep His Penis

In this world of ours in 2025, I have never ceased to be amazed by the absurdities that people believe. Even more so than the madness itself, what I am disgusted by is the fact that people who are supposed to be rational not only don’t disparage the insanity, they condone it, and empower the lunacy.

Let me set this scene, and you can judge for yourself.

There is a man, identified simply as K.S., who is taking Canadian taxpayers down his own personal yellow brick road. K.S. isn’t happy with just having his penis, he also wants a vagina, but he doesn’t want to pay for it.

In addition to wanting to become a hermaphrodite, Reduxx Magazine reports:

“His digital footprint included making sexually explicit posts on a Reddit board for ‘bigenital’ persons. In the online posts, he claimed to be a disability advocate and that he suffered from bipolar disorder.”

“K.S. also claimed to identify as a ‘transgender baby,’ a ‘little’ who is attracted to diapers, and as someone who is ‘obsessed’ with urinary and bowel incontinence. He claimed that his bedroom was designed to look like the bedroom of an eight-year-old girl’s.”

By any stretch of the imagination, this guy is mentally disturbed. Really disturbed.

According to court records reviewed by the National Post:

“K.S. “has experienced significant gender dysphoria since her teenage years, as well as physical, mental, and economic hardships to transition her gender expression to align with her gender identity.”

Despite what the court records state, there is no “her.”

K.S. is a male; therefore, the court records should reflect this. This type of indulgence of an obviously impaired, mentally disturbed individual only endorses the illness. In this case, the problem began in 2018 when Ontario began considering “non-binary” as a legitimate gender.

In 2022, K.S.’s doctor requested approval from Ontario’s Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) for a vaginoplasty without a penectomy. To paraphrase a line from The Godfather, leave the penis, add the vagina.

In a letter to OHIP, the doctor wrote that K.S.

“identifies as trans feminine but not completely on the ‘feminine’ end of the spectrum and for this reason it’s important for her to have a vagina while maintaining a penis.”

OHIP denied K.S.’s request because the procedure he wanted is considered “experimental.” It would not be performed in Canada; instead, it is offered at the Crane Center for Transgender Surgery in Austin, Texas. In addition, under

OHIP’s policies, vaginoplasty coverage goes hand in hand with penectomy coverage.

Undeterred, K.S. took his case to the province’s appeals board, arguing in court that he was concerned about suffering urinary incontinence if he went through with a penectomy. His lawyer argued:

“The risk of losing the ability to experience an orgasm and the concern that removing her penis would invalidate her non-binary identity.”

Listen to the insanity of the argument itself. “removing “her penis” should have been enough to throw this case out. Think about the amount of court time being wasted by delusional people and delusional lawyers making moronic arguments because mental cases like K.S. refuse to accept reality.

Unbelievably, the board overturned OHIP’s decision not to pay for the surgery. According to the National Post:

“OHIP then appealed to the Ontario Divisional Court, but lost again when a three-member panel of judges unanimously backed the tribunal’s position.”

“OHIP appealed again, losing a third time to the Ontario Court of Appeal, which, in another unanimous decision released in April, dismissed OHIP’s appeal and confirmed the lower court’s ruling.”

The appeal court ruled that penectomy was “neither recommended by K.S.’s health professionals nor desired by K.S.” and that it was up to OHIP officials to properly define vaginoplasty in its policies.

The court ruled:

“Here, the description chosen, ‘vaginoplasty,’ is broad enough to encompass different techniques. There is no suggestion that the existence of different techniques of performing a vaginoplasty detracts from the more basic notion that the procedure recommended for K.S. is still vaginoplasty.”

OHIP had one final option — take the case to Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice. However, months later, Ontario wussed out and decided to no longer pursue the appeal, instead kowtowing to K.S.’s demands.

According to Reduxx magazine, the procedure may cost Canadian taxpayers upwards of $70,000, if not more.

This is utter madness. Putting the $70,000+ aside, a principle of normalcy is being destroyed here. The courts have given in to a very disturbed individual; they should be ashamed, and the people of Ontario should be outraged.