The Lolita Line: Male School Bus Driver In Skirt, Knee Highs & Saddle Shoes

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: make something idiot proof, and they’ll build a better idiot. It’s no surprise that the new and improved idiots 99.9999 percent of the time come from the left. What amazes me is that these jackasses actually do things that most people would never even think of.

For instance, driving a school bus route for elementary school students. The job description is relatively simple. Obviously, you have to be licensed and capable of driving a bus. If you possess that skill, it’s just a matter of driving a set route with designated pickup spots.

Of course, you must obey all traffic laws and be a courteous driver. A pleasant personality and lots of patience also help, and it doesn’t hurt to enjoy children and the organized chaos they may bring.

For most normal people, those requirements are nothing more than a combination of common sense and common decency. However, those who follow the radical thought processes of the far left don’t possess those traits. Common sense and common decency are replaced by narcissism and a sense of entitlement that overrides all rational thought. How else can you explain the disgusting circumstances that these elementary school children had to tolerate until parental complaints led to his firing.

A male Canadian school bus driver who wore a frilly pink skirt, knee-high stockings, saddle shoes, and a gaudy bow has been fired after a post capturing the stomach-turning encounter between parents and the driver went viral.

The confrontation began when the freak stepped out of the bus in full view of a group of parents.

“You picked up the kids dressed like that?” one person in the video asked. The arrogant driver answered, “Yep.”

“Why do you call your bus the Lolita Line?” another concerned parent asked repeatedly as the driver just sauntered back into his yellow retreat and drove off.

The woman who recorded the video wrote this as a warning to other parents:

“Hide your children! Look up the meaning of Lolita, and you will understand soon enough! Normalizing pedophilia here in Woodbridge disguised as inclusivity! Canada has fallen, and it’s time to act.”

For the record, the name/term Lolita defines a young girl as “precociously seductive.” It originates from Vladimir Nabokov’s 1955 novel Lolita, which portrays the narrator Humbert’s sexual obsession with and victimization of a 12-year-old girl whom he privately calls “Lolita.” The term “Lolita,” when used to describe a young girl, is highly problematic due to its associations with the novel’s themes.

More recently, Sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, which he and his guests allegedly used to have sex with underage girls while traveling, was nicknamed the “Lolita Express.”

The York Catholic District School Board, which oversees school bus contracts, assured parents that it acted quickly after staff alerted them to the issue and the viral video.

The National Post acquired a written statement from Mark Brosens, a spokesperson for the school board, which read:

“The company quickly addressed this situation with its employee, and the driver will no longer provide busing to and from the school. The company has assured the YCDSB that this would not be an issue at any YCDSB schools going forward.”

Brosens added that in Ontario, school busing is provided by third-party companies.

“All bus drivers in Ontario are required to pass a Vulnerable Sector Check with their local police department, and they receive extensive training before transporting students. The YCDSB followed all of its child protection procedures after this incident.”

According to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Vulnerable Sector Check is an additional background search done by police to ensure potential employees in spaces with authority over children don’t have any prior sexual offenses.

I find it odd that the spokesperson stated, “The YCDSB followed all of its child protection procedures after this incident.” I understand his meaning. I’m sure follow-up procedures were required after such an occurrence was exposed, but how did this fruit loop slip through in the first place?

In the future, I hope this is a lesson for all school boards that even if a third party supplies the bus services, some daily scrutiny is required. There is no such thing as being too safe when children are involved.