Tucker v Levin: Yet Another Cage Match
We’re not going to spend too much time on this because, frankly, we already have.
But when Mark Levin starts calling Tucker Carlson “a loathsome ass” and “Qatarlson” in public—while accusing him of leaking stories and acting like a “desperate man”—it’s worth at least reminding ourselves what game is being played.
Because we’ve seen this script before.
RELATED
Trump, Levin, and the Narrative War Over Israel
The Cowboys, the Cartoons, the Conservative Controlled Opposition
The usual setup: A televised conservative titan starts mouthing off against another “ally” on the right, the outrage machine kicks into gear, and the base lines up to pick teams.
Which means the knives are out.
But instead of asking whether Levin’s latest tirade is “based” or whether Tucker has “lost the plot,” the better question is this:
Why does this always happen when certain narratives get too close to the bone?
We already noted months ago how Levin has played gatekeeper on Israel, treating any deviation from his script as heresy. And we already documented the long history of Con Inc cartoonishness—including caricatures of what a “patriot” is supposed to look like and supposed to mean.
Levin, for all his talk about liberty, rarely wants actual open debate, particularly when it comes to war in the Middle East. He wants orthodoxy. Controlled orthodoxy.
He wants what Trump himself seems to be trying to break in the American psyche.
It’s no accident that Tucker, who’s been asking uncomfortable questions–for a long time–about foreign policy, World War III, and who exactly benefits from endless aid packages, has suddenly become a punching bag again.
Because Carlson has proven he won’t play along.
Let’s just hope he’s not part of the plan too. Remember, all of this is about keeping us divided, no matter where the binary line falls.
We’ve explored that this week in two articles on Trump and Musk.
He won’t shout “Iran must be bombed” just because it polls well with a particular segment of the base. He won’t pretend the Likud platform is holy writ. He certainly won’t act like Trump guarantees a political, much less moral, resurrection in this country.
And that puts him in the crosshairs of the old guard—the ones who police the Overton Window, not expand it.
So now we’re back to the same old intra-party fight, dressed up like an ideological war.
But it’s not.
It’s a turf war.
And like always, it’s a distraction. A diversion. A proxy battle meant to keep the base entertained while the surveillance state expands, the financial noose tightens, and the global game of empire accelerates.
This is why they always want us focused on personalities–on TV characters we don’t even know.
Because if we start asking bigger questions—about American decline, the co-opting of religions intrinsically opposed to one another, the real trajectory of centuries-long geopolitical strategy—they lose control of the narrative.
So they give you Tucker vs Levin. Trump vs Musk. The theater of the absurd.
One question is who exactly is pulling these strings.
A better question is does it even matter.
We don’t need to watch the whole play again. We’ve already seen it.
Everyone should understand exactly what is going on here and in Los Angeles and all over the place after 2020.
If they don’t, that’s their own fault.
The only way to win this time, to correct course in a pattern that keeps giving us opportunity after opportunity to see it … is to leave the theater.
—
May everyone named directly or referenced indirectly ask forgiveness and do penance for their sins against America and God. I fight this information war in the spirit of justice and love for the innocent, but I have been reminded of the need for mercy and prayers for our enemies. I am a sinner in need of redemption as well after all, for my sins are many. In the words of Jesus Christ himself, Lord forgive us all, for we know not what we do.
