Shell Buries Itself With DEI And No One’s Digging It Out

We are fortunate to live on the beach, and my better half collects the most unusual things she can find. We have so many types of shells that now, when we take a walk, we will walk right past something that a tourist walking behind us is ecstatic to find. It’s really fun to see their reaction, and we will often find things that we think they would like to give to them.

There are times when some digging is necessary to uncover the shells you want, but once you have them, the minimal effort is worthwhile.

Shell USA, Inc., formerly known as Shell Oil Company, Inc., is a wholly owned subsidiary of Shell plc, a UK-based multinational corporation and one of the world’s largest oil companies. Approximately 18,000 employees work for Shell in the United States, with its headquarters located in Houston, Texas. Shell USA, along with its consolidated companies and equity stakes, ranks among the largest producers of oil and natural gas in America, as well as being a major player in natural gas marketing, fuel marketing, and petrochemical manufacturing.

The shell corporation chose the innocuous image of a seashell as its logo, but in their case, they’re not lying on a beautiful beach glistening in the sun or slightly buried under sugar sand. They are burying themselves under the stench of DEI, and no one cares about digging them up.

In a recent lawsuit, Oil giant Shell USA allegedly removed all white employees from its corporate security team in Houston, replacing them with less qualified individuals of color in what has been described as a discriminatory purge.

Kevin Taylor and Michelle Romak, a Gulf War veteran, both of whom are white, claim they were terminated from their jobs earlier this year despite having over a decade of relevant experience at Shell. They filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on Tuesday. In their lawsuit, they allege that Shell and Wayne Hunt, a regional security manager, took part in a discriminatory restructuring under DEI mandates that violate civil rights laws.

In January, Hunt announced a reorganization plan that required all white employees on the team to reapply for their current roles, while non-white team members were not required to submit applications, according to the lawsuit.

The suit claims that Hunt told Taylor that he had to resubmit for his current job because “others had expressed interest” and Shell “was looking to diversify the talent.”.

High-level security positions were awarded to a Hispanic woman, who had experience as an administrative assistant, and a Black man, who lacked any background in protecting people or assets, according to the lawsuit.

Additionally, a Hispanic contractor for Shell, whose contract was previously being terminated due to poor performance, also joined the team.

Furthermore, a Hispanic woman without U.S. citizenship was appointed to a high-level role at Shell in Mexico after it was discovered that she was ineligible for the position because of her citizenship status, as stated in the complaint.

The lawsuit alleges that Shell has maintained illegal racial hiring and promotion quotas in the US, despite efforts by the Trump administration to eliminate unfair and unconstitutional DEI programs.

On its website, the oil company boasts that it is:

“Working to become one of the most diverse and inclusive organizations in the world.” Apparently, by any means possible, even if it means violating the civil rights of others.

The company has a Global Council for Race consisting of senior executives that

“Aims to advance diversity in our workforce so that it better reflects communities in which we work.”

This is nothing more than a convenient copout, an excuse to initiate a quota program to satisfy some sick agenda of the left that’s fueled by white hatred. An agenda that replaces competence and merit with race-baiting and the heightening of sexual preference to the status of prominence.

As a result, Taylor was removed from his position and relocated to the East Coast, while Romak and Thomas Hutt—a white man and US veteran who had worked at Shell for 15 years—were terminated, according to the lawsuit.

In a disreputable act of defamation, Hunt, who oversaw the security team, appeared to mock the firings of Romak and Hutt by giving each of them a “tear jar,” according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit clarified, “This is evidence of conduct that is callous, willful, and wanton.”

It was clear that the promoted employees had weaker qualifications, with at least one asking Taylor for assistance in their new role, according to the lawsuit.

Taylor was removed from his position in Houston and replaced by Ana Chevez, a Hispanic woman. He was then reassigned to a security advisor role in the eastern region, which was his third choice out of four, according to the lawsuit.

However, Taylor has been repeatedly asked to complete tasks that belong to Chevez—such as guarding the CEO—because it was widely known that she was not competent to fulfill those duties, according to the lawsuit.

To add insult to injury, Taylor was also passed over for his second-choice position in the west region, which went to Hector Erazo, a Hispanic man and contractor for Shell, the suit states.

According to the lawsuit, Hutt—who supervised Taylor and Romak before his termination—stated that both were more qualified than Erazo. He had been in the process of terminating Erazo’s contract in 2024 due to poor performance.

Since taking on the role in August, Erazo has sought Taylor’s assistance, alleging that he has never completed a security assessment or a security plan for executive protection. He even admitted to having never seen one, as noted in the lawsuit.

”Juli Haller, attorney for America First Legal, which filed the suit on behalf of Taylor and Romak, said in a statement:           

“What our clients experienced should alarm every American. If a corporation can openly discriminate against employees because of the color of their skin — under the guise of DEI — then no one’s rights are safe.”

It’s surprising that when many companies are moving away from the farce of DEI, a company the size of Shell would jump back into the stagnant waters of racism and unfair hiring practices.

If these accusations are accurate, Shell didn’t dip its toe into the abyss; they climbed up to the high dive and dove in headfirst.

This appears to be just the tip of the iceberg. If it is, every dollar that it costs Shell won’t be enough. This is nothing more than white hatred on steroids. The idea of handing out “tear jars” as parting gifts to white employees who were wronged is disgusting, and if any other race were involved, Shell would be under attack by looters and protesters.

If Shell passed over or fired anyone else because of their skin color or sexual orientation, I urge them to come forward. This weakens not only the company but the country by placing undeserving individuals in positions of authority. The oil business can be dangerous. Shell has apparently forgotten that fact.