Radicals Have A New Name For Content Happy Stay-At-Home Women

The extremists on the left are at it again. This time, it’s American women who are happy and content to remain out of the workplace who are in their sights. An article in The Guardian, written by a left-wing zealot named Adrienne Matei, compares the choice of these women to what took place in Nazi Germany. On her LinkedIn page, she wrote this.

“Please read my first Guardian feature essay, about how women shoulder the burdens of fascism’s failure, and are expected to do so with a smile.”

The article is titled: “From Nazi Germany to Trump’s America: why strongmen rely on women at home.” Under the title, Matei writes: “Fascist regimes pushed narratives of domestic bliss, yet relied on women’s unpaid labor. In the US today, ‘womanosphere’ influencers promote the same fantasies.”

Fantasies?

This is another stark example of how radical left views differ from the mainstream. The left claims that they want women to take possession of their lives. How many times have you heard them scream, “My body, My choice?”

Yet, if a woman chooses to stay home because that is where her heart and happiness lie, she is demonized and compared to Nazis.

Speaking of demonizing, Google’s “AI Overview” of “Womanosphere” is pure political rhetoric and about as anti-conservative as it can get. Calling the simple choice of being a stay-at-home female “anti-feminist” and “far right.”

It states:

“Womanosphere,” also known as the “femosphere,” refers to online spaces for women that promote anti-feminist, often far-right, conservative viewpoints. These platforms mirror the “manosphere” by building a parallel media ecosystem, but for a female audience. The movement has gained prominence in recent years through podcasts, social media, and influencers who promote traditional gender roles. 

Key themes and messages

• Rejection of feminism:
• Womanosphere narratives often argue that liberal feminism has failed women by pushing them into unfulfilling professional roles at the expense of family life.
• Emphasis on tradition: 
• The content promotes traditional family structures, often idealizing the role of a wife and mother. This aligns with the “tradwife” (traditional wife) trend.
• “Make America Hot Again” (MAHA): 
• The movement promotes a conservative lifestyle through pop culture, wellness, and self-improvement content, often packaging political messages within a lifestyle and beauty framework.
• Anti-“woke” rhetoric: 
• Like the manosphere, the womanosphere positions itself as a virtuous quest to rid society of “woke, feminist ideals”.
• Focus on lifestyle: 
• Influencers often discuss parenting, wellness, and dating from a conservative perspective, framing traditional life as a path to happiness and purpose. 
• Influencers and platforms
• The womanosphere is fueled by podcasts and social media influencers who often build large followings by focusing on lifestyle topics before revealing or embedding their political leanings. Notable examples include: 
• Erika Kirk: Following the death of her husband, Charlie Kirk, Erika Kirk became CEO of Turning Point USA. She promotes prioritizing marriage and motherhood over career goals.
• Katie Miller: The wife of former Trump aide Stephen Miller launched a podcast aimed at conservative women interested in healthy living and traditional family life.
• Brett Cooper: This conservative influencer and Fox News contributor promotes a “tradwife” lifestyle, arguing that feminism has sold women a “bill of goods” by overemphasizing career. 

Political impact

Analysts suggest the womanosphere is a strategic effort by the conservative movement to influence young women politically. Similar to how the manosphere mobilized male voters, the womanosphere is seen as a way to build a robust female conservative media ecosystem that could impact elections. While many young women still lean left, the womanosphere’s messaging is a growing force that aims to shift younger demographics to the right.”

The left’s paranoia is fueled by its hatred of everything considered acceptable by conservatives. Conservatives couldn’t care less if a woman is a CEO or a stay-at-home wife. They are happy for both and pass no judgment on either. On the other hand, Democrats and liberals, who love to view themselves as progressive, hate the idea that some women refuse to take the knee at their altar of liberal conformity.

Someone needs to inform Matei that families survived for generations with one parent choosing the outside workplace, and the other conducting the duties of the home. When I was growing up, a working mother was rare if there was a father in the family, and I don’t remember any of them wanting things to change.

Raising a family and caring for a home is a lot of work, and despite what propaganda spreaders like Matei want you to believe, women did not hate their role then, and neither do the women who choose it now.

Comparing women to Nazis and making the statement that “women shoulder the burdens of fascism’s failure and are expected to do so with a smile” is uneducated gibberish and nothing more than a futile example of its “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.”

For Matei, who uses she/her pronouns, that option no longer exists.

M. Harris