On Colonialism And Modern Mass Migration

Between 1815 and 1914 22.6 million people left the United Kingdom to settle in the rest of the world. This was the height of Empire and of British emigration.

12 million of this number went to the US, which at that point was already an established westernised nation. 1.7 million were Irish fleeing the potato famine, with in many cases a hatred of the Empire. So it’s historically illiterate on several fronts to consider this 12 million as ‘settlers’ or as colonialists advancing the ‘wicked Empire’.

That leaves 10 million in a century. The vast majority were again not going to other nations and assuming positions of authority as colonial rulers. And they were spread over the entire globe. The most common destinations were Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

This left very little permanent British settlement in Africa, India and other ‘non white’ nations. In the vast majority of cases, white settlement never exceeded the numbers of non white natives. In India and Africa, it never came even anywhere close. Through the entire history of colonialism, these native populations were assured of remaining the majority.

What we are talking about is 1 million people every 10 years, spread across the ENTIRE globe.

The landmass of the UK is 93,000 square miles.

The landmass of the US is 3.8 million square miles. Britain fits into the US 40 times.

The landmass of Canada is similar to that of the US. It’s also listed as 3.8 million square miles, but is slightly larger than the US. Britain fits into Canada 41 times.

Australia has a landmass which is a little under 3 million square miles. Britain fits into Australia between 31-37 times, depending on slightly different calculations.

The landmass of India is 1.2 million square miles. Britain fits into India 13 times.

Africa’s landmass is 11.7 million square miles. Britain fits into Africa 120 times.

The landmass that Brits settled over a century is approximately 231 times larger than the British Isles, at a minimum which only includes the areas above.

Almost none of those settlers were stealing anything. There was no welfare to claim. There was no asylum to claim. They were not presented with oppressed native servants on arrival. They came from the only nation on Earth that was vigorously opposing slavery globally. They had to work. Only a tiny fraction of them were assuming posts of authority as colonial administrators and the most popular destination was already outside the Empire.

The entire narrative of the evils of colonialism is, as commonly presented, horseshit. People didn’t steal things that were already there. They built things that had never been there. By enormous effort. And far more their own effort, than that of ‘exploited natives’.

By contrast, over a million people a year are coming from the entire globe to the UK. Colonialism-1 million people every 10 years to the ENTIRE WORLD. Modern mass immigration and Globalism-1 million people from the ENTIRE WORLD to the tiny UK every SINGLE year.

The UK has added the same number of people to its small landmass in 10-20 years that it settled in the entire rest of the world over 100 years at the height of colonialism and colonial settlement.

Globalists have conducted a colonial conquest of the UK at least 10 times more devastating, in terms of numbers alone in a 10 year period, than colonialism at its height, in an area 231 times more concentrated.

Which is to say nothing of the difference between going somewhere and building something better, and going somewhere and simply destroying what was there. By that judgement, too, in most cases colonialism was far more morally justified than modern mass immigration and the betrayal of once peaceful, successful and harmonious nation states with defined borders.

It is said that natives elsewhere were never asked if they wanted to accept settlement and colonialism. But nobody in the native population of the UK was asked if they wanted globalism, multiculturalism, fairly rapid demographic extinction, race based child rape gangs, terrorism, Islam, minority status, and the permanent alteration of their nation while being told they are racist to notice it and facing arrest if they protest against it.

The reality is that European colonialism and The British Empire was far more morally justified than modern mass immigration and created far more of worth than modern mass immigration has. It is objectively the case that an imperialist can point to far more material, objective and real world improvements from 19th century colonial emgration, than a Globalist can point to material, objective and real world improvement from mass migration into the West.

It is also the case that even if both are morally wrong, one is a wrong that no longer exists, and the other is the wrong being committed today. If native non European populations were right to oppose change, settlement and conquest, why aren’t white populations in Europe right to do the same today? Why are white populations the only populations on Earth not entitled to preserve a homeland, a majority population, and the culture, traditions and places that their ancestors owned? If moving to another place and demanding they change is racist and evil, why is it not racist and evil when it is done to white majority nations?