The UK Government’s Shame Grows With Revelations About The Southport Killer

The Southport killer targeted the most innocent civilians imaginable. He wanted to provoke as much terror as possible. He stabbed each of his victims multiple times. He stabbed other children. He tried to behead his victims, copying the classic Islamic terrorism beheading acts. 

He had an al Qeada training manual and stores to develop ricin poison gas in his flat. 

The training manual of an Islamic terrorist organisation. 

Police at the time concealed the details of the contents of the flat. 

At the same time, people were imprisoned for speculating or claiming that the killer was an immigrant or a Muslim. 

The Southport enquiry has since revealed (in January) that the killers parents were Christians and that the police wanted to reveal this to combat ‘disinformation’. For mainstream media and fact checkers, this confirms that the killer, too, must have been a Christian.

Because nobody ever has different views or joins a different faith to their parents, do they? That’s impossible to contemplate. 

Presumably most devout Christians copy Islamic beheadings and have Al Qaeda training manuals, according to this logic. Perhaps that’s more common in Rwanda, as Axel’s father was an immigrant who would have either witnessed, been threatened by, or even participated in the Rwandan massacres. Axel was a 2nd generation immigrant. 

Remember, people were questioned, arrested, demonised and in some cases imprisoned for speculation about his immigrant status and his faith. 

Before his murders, Axel Rudakubana was dismissed as not being a terrorist threat: 

“He was referred to the government’s counter-terrorism Prevent programme three times between 2019 and 2021 due to his obsession with violence, though authorities did not classify him as a terrorist threat.

Police found evidence of ricin production and an al-Qaeda training manual at his home in Banks, Lancashire, which led to additional charges, although the attack was not officially declared terror-related.”

Three times Prevent was told, this guy looks like a terrorist. Three times they said, no he doesn’t. 

Then he murdered three children in a knife attack mirroring multiple Islamic terror attacks. 

Now the Southport enquiry doubles down, again concluding he wasn’t a terrorist. The same conclusion that let him commit his attack. 

Why? 

Well admitting he was a terrorist would mean admitting that the people the State arrested and imprisoned were right. As would admitting that non terrorist Christians generally don’t possess Islamic terror manuals. 

Everything Axel did was textbook Islamic terrorism. But it’s not terrorism. And it’s not Islamic. It’s a devout Christian with mental health issues. Don’t think about the contents of his flat. 

Meanwhile, Tommy Robinson is arrested and charged on terrorism offences for refusing to supply his mobile phone PIN number. Oh, and for driving a Bentley on his way to Spain. Apparently, a Bentley is proof of terrorist activity. The policeman who stopped him said that he suspected that the driver was Tommy Robinson before he stopped him. 

So driving while being Tommy Robinson is also proof of terrorism. 

That trial is ongoing. Mainstream media are trusted to report live from it. Alternative media have been warned not to report live from it. 

According to the Prevent strategy itself, thinking that western civilisation is in trouble or the UK is being threatened via mass immigration is also terrorism. So essentially more than half the country are terrorists, according to the anti terrorism strategy our police and security services work from. 

It’s just killing three little girls in a savage knife attack after reading Al Qaeda training manuals that isn’t terrorism. 

It’s just Axel who isn’t a terrorist. But Tommy is, and most of us are, apparently. 

These are the authorities we are supposed to trust to protect us?