Roaming Rape/Grooming Gangs Aren’t Enough, Glamour Magazine UK Adds Insult To Injury

I hate to say it, but at this moment in time, the UK no longer exists. Overwhelmed by radical Muslim influence that is so strong that the police there turn their backs on British citizens because they are afraid to enforce the law against radical Muslims.

You can’t become a doormat unless you lie down, and the UK is spread-eagled, face down on the ground. They were systematically invaded, and their politicians aided and abetted the attack.

Since as far back as 1997 and probably further, the UK has turned its back on the fact that roaming rape/grooming gangs have been victimizing young girls. Reports of young girls being groomed by gangs of men, primarily of Pakistani heritage, first began to emerge in 2002 when the then-Labour MP Ann Cryer warned that this was occurring in her West Yorkshire constituency of Keighley.

In 2010, a group of five men were convicted of sexual offenses against girls aged 12 to 16 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire. The Times then launched an extensive investigation that revealed not only the shocking extent of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham but also a broader pattern of horrific abuse of young girls by organized networks, primarily involving British-Pakistani men.

The story began to gain broader attention. In recent years, child-grooming gangs have been convicted in more than a dozen towns across England, primarily in the north and the Midlands. Notable locations include Rochdale, Oldham, and Telford, as well as Bristol, Oxford, Huddersfield, Halifax, and Banbury, among others.

Child sexual abuse is primarily perpetrated by relatives and other trusted individuals. In certain cases, however, gangs have employed grooming techniques to target their victims in public spaces. The victims are typically girls aged 11 to 16, predominantly from white backgrounds and often facing difficult circumstances. These girls are showered with attention from men who are just a few years older, many of whom work as taxi drivers or in takeaways, with some being involved in the illegal drug trade. The girls are often given alcohol or drugs and then deceived or coerced into having sexual relations with one man, who subsequently hands them over to be raped, often violently, by his friends or relatives.

“It is difficult to convey the horrific nature of the abuse suffered by child victims,” stated a 2014 report by Jay investigating abuse in Rotherham. “They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in northern England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated.” Children were “doused in petrol and threatened with being set on fire, threatened with guns, forced to witness brutally violent rapes, and told that they would be next if they reported anything. Girls as young as eleven were raped by numerous male perpetrators.” Some victims lost their lives: in Telford, Lucy Lowe died at the age of 16, along with her mother and sister, when her abuser set fire to their home in 2000. She was pregnant—again—by him at the time of her death.

In Rotherham, it is estimated that at least 1,400 girls were abused by grooming gangs between 1997 and 2013. In Telford, over 1,000 children were reportedly abused over a span of three decades. An inquiry in Rochdale identified 74 probable victims, suggesting a much larger issue. However, the statistics are incomplete and remain highly contested.

A series of local inquiries have revealed an official response that was wholly inadequate. In her 2014 Rotherham report, Jay stated that South Yorkshire Police had treated child victims with “contempt” and that social workers had minimized the issue.

In at least two instances, police arrested the fathers of abused girls when the fathers tried to remove their daughters from the homes where the abuse was occurring. In another case, police responded to a rundown house and discovered an intoxicated girl with several male abusers. They arrested the girl for being “drunk and disorderly,” but did not detain any of the men involved.

Inquiries conducted in both Telford and Rotherham revealed that child sexual exploitation was often dismissed as “child prostitution.” Additionally, teachers and social workers faced discouragement when it came to reporting instances of abuse. There was also a lack of protection for witnesses. Similar issues were identified in other inquiries and reviews in Rochdale and Oldham.

Recent testimonies from victims have alleged that some police officers themselves abused girls, and that corrupt police officers collaborated with the gangs or failed to respond to incidents of child sexual exploitation, according to the BBC. As of now, no public servants have been charged in connection with the scandal.

Many of the victims came from care homes. Some police officers referred to them as “slags” and described their abuse as a “lifestyle choice,” resulting in the issue being given low priority. Prosecutors viewed the victims as unreliable witnesses. In Rotherham, social workers often felt “overwhelmed,” as found by Jay. Another inquiry revealed that Rotherham Council was “in denial.”

There is also the problem of ethnicity. Early whistleblowers, including MP Ann Cryer, former police officer Maggie Oliver, and journalists Andrew Norfolk and Julie Bindel, were dismissed as Islamophobic and racist. In 2004, a Channel 4 documentary about Asian men grooming girls in Bradford was postponed due to fears it could incite race riots. Evidence suggests that many officials were concerned about being accused of racism; Jay discovered that councilors worried that discussing the issue could disrupt “community cohesion.” An inquiry into Telford also identified a “nervousness about race.” A vast amount of evidence was ignored, leading to numerous claims of cover-ups.

In her report, Casey stated that the system “consistently failed” to recognize that the perpetrators were predominantly of Asian or Pakistani backgrounds and targeted white girls. She noted that “flawed data” was “repeatedly used to dismiss claims about ‘Asian grooming gangs’ as sensationalized, biased, or untrue.” State institutions often avoided discussing the issue for fear of appearing racist, exacerbating community tensions, or causing problems with community cohesion.

Knowing all of this was happening around them, the so-called fashion magazine Glamour UK decided to stick the social knife deeper into all women by featuring no women, zero, zilch, nada, on the cover of their blasphemous “Women of the Year” issue.

Let that sink in.

In a nation ravaged by animalistic behavior against women, this liberal rag decided to place nine men pretending to be women on the cover instead of using actual women. I would call this he journalistic version of spitting in the face of women, except for the fact that this doesn’t qualify as journalism in any way.

The men on the cover are as much of a disgrace as the magazine that displayed their ignorance. All of these clowns wore shirts narcissistically emblazoned with the words “Protect The Dolls.”

For those of you concerned more with reality than radical leftist illusions, as I was, “Doll” refers to transgender-identified men who seek a feminine appearance. The men featured present themselves as models, activists, and influencers. One identifies as a communications officer, while another works as a DJ.

To demonstrate how out of touch the magazine and the men they chose to pretend to be women are, this is what Shon Faye at Glamour UK had to say.

“On the day of our shoot, most of the cover stars pointed out that the main way you protect a doll is to book one: more than just affection, trans women need employment, opportunities, and money to enjoy true security and autonomy.”

Really? These people are nothing more than users; here they are on a magazine cover, denigrating real women, and the magazine is trying to drum up sympathy for their sick delusions.

For the record, Faye is one of the lunatics who is a biological man pretending to be a woman and has the nerve to lecture others about dignity. Something this clown lost when he decided to ignore biology, science, and common sense to follow an obvious delusion and make a fool out of himself.

“What it seems we really crave is to work, love, and exist with dignity and, more broadly, the opportunities to thrive.”

Too late, Bozo, you were born with undeniably male equipment, and no matter how hard you try to reason yourself out of this blatant stupidity, you are not a woman, and neither are the nine mentally disturbed individuals your staff chose to put on the cover of your rag magazine.

Author J.K. Rowling criticized the magazine cover on X, stating:

“I grew up in an era when mainstream women’s magazines told girls they needed to be thinner and prettier. Now, mainstream women’s magazines tell girls that men are better than the women they are.

Glamour UK is a disgrace, but it fits in with everything else that’s taking place in this now lost sovereign state.

RIP UK, maybe you can mention Glamour magazine on your tombstone, unless it’s offensive to those who now control you.