In Politics, Kamala Harris Is the Skill-Bereft Bohemian Artist
Kamala Harris Is Modern Art One morning 20 plus years ago, I visited the Frick Museum in New York. I’m not one of these touchy-feelyRead More
-
Trump & Musk: A Dance That Goes Way Back
The “Haters will say this is AI” post by Musk should tell you everything you need to know about his true history with Trump. DoRead More
-
Divisive, Erratic, Insanity. The Left Is Dragging Us Into Hell
Most of us want peace in the world, and because of that, we avoid confrontation. Unfortunately, there will be no peace in our country untilRead More
-
A Smorgasbord Of The Bizarre, Questionable, And Infuriating
The American mainstream media is a cesspool. They see themselves as the chosen, which is hilarious when you consider that they rarely have a cognitiveRead More
-
Biden Said “Watch Me.” The Country Just Did.
ATLANTA — President Biden repeated the same line for four years when politicians, voters, or the press conveyed concern about his age. He often says,Read More
-
Did We Hear What Trump Just Said About the JFK Files?
Yes, we are all tired of hearing about it. Release the documents. It’s been sixty years. Donald Trump is speaking in his recognizable way again,Read More
-
Biden’s Recently Promoted Freak Has His Bigotry Exposed
An old expression says, “A leopard never changes its spots,” meaning one can’t change one’s character, even if one tries very hard. The expression, sometimes alsoRead More
-
Good News Joe says Don’t Believe Your Lyin’ Eyes
So far, Slow Joe has committed $100 billion to fight human caused climate change even though we have no idea if humans are impacting the climate at all. There isn’t a single experiment that confirms human involvement in a climate that is constantly evolving. Atmospheric water vapor, increased solar activity, changes in tidal activity, lack of volcanic activity and rotational changes in the earth’s orbit are all plausible explanations for the rise in ambient and surface temperatures. Until technology advances to the point where we can apply the scientific method to the climate change puzzle, spending this kind of cash on a theory is inexcusable.
In the meantime, wouldn’t it make more sense to apply these resources to mitigating the effects of climate change? For example, how much wildfire technology and manpower could $100 billion buy? How much flood-proofing construction could be completed for $100 billion?
-
Canadian Cancer Society Offends Women By Choosing Words More Comfortable For Transgenders
The assault on women seems to be endless at this point. Everything from women’s sports to pageants are now being infiltrated by mentally ill menRead More
-
Justice Department sues Live Nation, seeks breakup
(The Center Square) – The federal government wants to force the divorce of Live Nation and Ticketmaster more than a decade after it allowed the entertainmentRead More