Start the Twilight Zone Music, A “Three Parent Baby” Was Born In The UK. Does This Open Pandora’s Box?
For a country with a “royal family” locked in a time warp of tradition and can take pomp and circumstance to $125 million dollar levels, the U.K. has just as rigid of a “woke side.”
From setting up safety zones around abortion clinics and arresting people for doing nothing more than saying silent prayers outside of them, to hiring criminals to work on their police force, the U.K. has demonstrated that like an egg, they have a weak woke center that’s wrapped in a deceptive shell of phony dignity.
Recently, the BBC reported that an anonymous child was conceived by two parents, with the aid of a third female donor. The DNA from the additional female donor was said to only amount to .01 percent.
The reason for the third-party involvement is known as Mitochondrial Replacement Technology (MRT), which is meant to prevent children form being born with mitochondrial disease. Using in vitro fertilization (IVF) to replace unhealthy mitochondrial DNA, the idea is to substitute healthy DNA from the donor.
To help you understand exactly what mitochondrial DNA is, here’s a simple, yet complicated explanation. Mitochondrial DNA is the circular chromosome found inside the cellular organelles called mitochondria. Located in the cytoplasm, mitochondria are the site of the cell’s energy production and other metabolic functions. Offspring inherit mitochondria and as a result mitochondrial DNA is from their mother. Being a lineage genetic marker, mtDNA genome can provide information about ancestors, including health/disease information. Mitochondrial DNA tests can trace people’s matrilineal (mother-line) ancestry through their mitochondria, which are passed from mothers to their children.
Although the health consequences of inherited mitochondrial DNA alterations vary widely, frequently observed features include muscle weakness and wasting, problems with movement, diabetes, kidney failure, heart disease, loss of intellectual functions (dementia), hearing loss, and problems involving the eyes and vision.
This child is thought to be one of just three or four that have been born utilizing this technique since 2016. Obviously, this brings about many questions and in my mind they are not only medical, but ethical and moral.
First, how is it determined that there are issues with the mothers mitochondrial DNA, and if it can be determined, why have there been so few completed in the last seven years?
Second, and call me skeptical, how can we really believe that what we are being told is actually what is being done? After the lies that we have been told concerning the “plandemic’s” origin, the use of worthless masks and all of the vaccine lies, this sounds like it could be medicine grounded in Bill Gate’s soil.
Professor Robin Lovell-Badge of the Francis Crick Research Institute, also has concerns:
“It will be interesting to know how well the mitochondrial replacement therapy technique worked at a practical level, whether the babies are free of mitochondrial disease, and whether there is any risk of them developing problems later in life.”
While the process may sound harmless, the mitochondrial donation can be performed in two ways, before or after fertilization. If completed after fertilization, it entails the destruction of an already-conceived embryonic human from the donor.
Marcy Darnovsky, executive director of the Center for Genetics and Society in Berkeley, California had this warning:
“Many secular and actively pro-choice scientists, bioethicists and women’s-health advocates have voiced grave and detailed concerns about the safety and utility of mitochondrial replacement and about authorizing the intentional genetic modification of children and their descendants. She warns that MRT crosses a, “legal and ethical line” that genetic-engineering tools should not be used to modify gametes or early embryos and so manipulate the characteristics of future children.”
These children are human beings, not lab rats. I’m all for making wonderful strides in medicine, but this feels shadowy at best. Among our worst fears is that this will open the door to much more radical procedures.
In December, I wrote a column about a proposed concept called “EctoLife” where manmade “pods” will replace human wombs. The idea is championed by a “pitchman” named Hashem Al-Ghaili.
Al-Ghaili’s resume states that that he is a molecular biotechnologist, science communicator, director, and producer. Although, he is best known for his infographics and videos about scientific breakthroughs.
As you will see, Al-Ghaili takes a lot of credit for the idea of the “womb facility.” Although he may have contributed some of the ideological concepts, his background seems to peg him as more of a ringmaster or front man for the project. Someone with just enough knowledge to sell a controversial matrix like proposition to what is bound to be a reluctant and skeptical public.
There are currently no concrete plans to build an EctoLife facility, but these presentations and the people that promote them are taking the first steps to expose the public to the idea.
This is how it begins. Propose a radical idea, highlight its benefits, downplay it’s obvious flaws and slowly massage the concept into the collective mindset of the population.
The EctoLife facility that Al-Ghaili describes could incubate up to 30,000 babies a year. It would operate solely on renewable energy and would enable infertile couples to conceive their own biological offspring.
In November Ghaili stated:
“My new concept is something that I have been working on for a while. The new concept relies on over 50 years of groundbreaking scientific research,” declared the 32-year-old Ghaili.
In a press release the conceptualization was explained further:
It’s a perfect solution for women who had their uterus surgically removed due to cancer or other complications. With EctoLife, premature births and C-sections will be a thing of the past. EctoLife is designed to help countries that are suffering from severe population decline, including Japan, Bulgaria, South Korea, and many others.”
In an interview with “Science and Stuff,” Al-Ghaili proclaimed that he believes the EctoLife concept will eventually replace natural childbirth. The 30,000 per year birth figure is explained by having a building that houses 75 separate, functional labs. Each lab would contain 400 “growth pods” or “artificial wombs” that will duplicate the conditions inside the mother’s uterus.
“EctoLife allows your baby to develop in an infection-free environment. The pods are made of materials that prevent germs from sticking to their surfaces. Every growth pod features sensors that can monitor your baby’s vital signs, including heartbeat, temperature, blood pressure, breathing rate and oxygen saturation. The artificial-intelligence-based system also monitors the physical features of your baby and reports any potential genetic abnormalities.”
“The pods are equipped with a screen that displays real-time data on the developmental progress of your baby. These data are sent directly to your phone so you can track your baby’s health from the comfort of your zone.”
“The app also provides you with a high-resolution live view of your baby’s development. A special section in the app allows you to watch a timelapse of your baby’s growth and share it directly with your loved ones.”
“EctoLife will also help you edit any trait you like for your baby, including customizing your “baby’s eye color, hair color, skin tone, physical strength, height, and level of intelligence.”
“And if you want your baby to stand out and have a brighter future, our Elite Package offers you the opportunity to genetically engineer the embryo before implanting it into the artificial womb. Thanks to CRISPR-Cas 9 gene editing tool, you can edit any trait of your baby through a wide range of over 300 genes. By genetically engineering a set of genes, the Elite Package allows you to customize your baby’s eye color, hair color, skin tone, physical strength, height, and level of intelligence. It also allows you to fix any inherited genetic diseases that are part of your family history so that your baby and their offspring will live a healthy comfortable life free of genetic diseases. Say goodbye to the pain of childbirth and birth-related muscle contractions.”
If all of this sounds cold and inhuman to you, get in line. Yet, it does present some interesting questions. It is a well-known fact that in the “New World Order,” that has been openly discussed by elitists like Bill Gates and others, population reduction is high on their list of priorities.
Could this be phase two of their plan?
Eliminate 2/3 thirds of the population that they view as inferior and begin re-populating with bio-engineered and genetically engineered human servants.
These humanoids would have predetermined personalities, political affiliations, occupations and even life expectancies. They may even be programmed with a mental switch, known only to the creators that can be triggered at any point in their life to initiate an attack, or another type of sinister undertaking.
In a global society that is fiercely divided by prolife believers and those that back abortion, why are extremely sophisticated “Baby Farms” being brought forward for us to contemplate?
Also, ask yourself this. These “pod farms” would be astronomically expensive to construct and operate, so “why” isn’t the only question. Finding out “who” wants them built is not only absolutely necessary, but it may also answer the “why” question as well.
As I said, I’m all for the exponential growth in medical treatments. However, under the cloud of cynicism that the left has created concerning gender, color me skeptical of their true motives. Much more testing and proof needs to be presented before we place our future in the hands of woke idealists with visions of world domination.