There’s A Reason Wisconsin Voters Wear Cheese With Holes On Their Heads
What is going on in Wisconsin? You expect this kind of left-leaning, radical nonsense in California, New York, or even Michigan, but over the last several years, Wisconsin has lost its way.
Two years ago, in March 2023, I wrote a column about an upcoming election for the state Supreme Court. In that column, titled “Don’t Do It, Wisconsin, Janet Protasiewicz Is A Plague That Your State Doesn’t Need,” I attempted to warn the citizens of exactly how liberal Protasiewicz was by highlighting some of the cases in which she severely under-sentenced sex offenders.
Less than five months later, I wrote another Column titled, “You Were Warned, Wisconsin, Protasiewicz Is Already Up To No Gouda.” I wrote this because, unfortunately, Protasiewicz had been elected, giving liberals a 4-3 majority in the state Supreme Court.
Last month, Wisconsin made another bad decision when it re-elected Jill Underly as the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. They chose Underly over Brittany Kinser, who is pro-school choice and backed by conservatives.
Under Underly’s guidance, Wisconsin schools have the LARGEST gap between white and minority students.
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
“In 2024, Wisconsin had the widest achievement gap in the US for math and reading scores between Black and White students, with Black fourth graders scoring 45 points lower in reading than their White peers, and Black eighth graders scoring 39 points lower.”
The icing on the cake came on February 18th, when the Governor, Tony Evers, and the Wisconsin Democrats introduced the executive budget bill filed by the Joint Committee on Finance. This bill addresses a wide range of topics for the 2025-2027 fiscal biennium, including agriculture, education, and funding for rural health clinics.
The bill also recognizes same-sex marriage by making gender-neutral references in the statutes to spouses. The terms “wife,” “mother,” “father,” and “husband” were replaced with gender-neutral terms, such as spouse and person. The word “mother” was replaced by “inseminated person,” and “husband of the mother” was changed to “the spouse of the inseminated person.”
The preposterous changes lit a fire under the Republican Governors Association (RGA). The RGA Executive Director, Sara Craig, issued this statement regarding the changes.
“Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers’ latest left-wing push isn’t just out of touch, it’s offensive to mothers. Being a mother is the greatest privilege I will have in my lifetime, and every mother I know feels the same. If Tony Evers can reduce motherhood to an ‘inseminated person,’ our society is lost.”
You have to wonder precisely what Evers is trying to accomplish with this nonsense. Stupid is as Stupid does, and Evers’s even suggesting these changes demonstrates that he has completely lost touch with the American public and reality.
However, incompetence isn’t the only thing Wisconsin voters have sent into office. By continuing to believe liberal Democratic lies and voting accordingly, they have allowed deceit and death to more significantly infiltrate their state by way of Planned Parenthood.
The left-wing majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court is concealing something, and the evidence suggests a deliberate effort to undermine the judicial process. The Wisconsin Supreme Court has become embroiled in a troubling leak scandal that jeopardizes the safety of unborn babies.
Investigators released their findings on Wednesday regarding the deliberate leak of a draft order from the Wisconsin Supreme Court dating back to June 2024. This document indicated that the court would hear Planned Parenthood’s case, which seeks to declare the right to abortion as a “constitutional right” in Wisconsin.
The investigation cost Wisconsin taxpayers $165,740, yet investigators could not determine who leaked this critical document to the left-leaning news site, Wisconsin Watch. The report confirmed that the leak was “likely deliberate” rather than accidental, emphasizing the calculated efforts to sway public opinion on abortion in the state.
Not surprisingly, all seven justices condemned the leak, describing it as “a breach of trust that the court had not experienced in its history.”
The investigation revealed that Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, one of the four justices who voted to hear Planned Parenthood’s case, forwarded a draft order to her personal email account. This was the only time the document was sent outside the state court system before Wisconsin Watch published its article.
Bradley’s law clerk stated that this was “standard operating procedure.” However, this raises significant concerns about security protocols and highlights why sensitive court documents related to critical issues are being sent to personal email accounts.
Bradley, who is conveniently set to retire in August, will be succeeded by another left-leaning judge, Susan Crawford. This transition will ensure that the 4-3 leftist majority, which jeopardizes unborn babies, remains in place.
Critical computer data that could have identified the culprit has mysteriously disappeared in what seems suspiciously advantageous for those who may have leaked the document. Investigators reported that the website visitation logs for the crucial two-week period leading up to the leak were incomplete. Only the logs from June 26 and June 27 were available, despite the article being published on June 26.
The investigation report indicates the absence of this missing data:
“significantly hampered the ability to thoroughly examine the circumstances surrounding the leak.”
It is quite suspicious that the evidence identifying the individual responsible for leaking the pro-abortion document has mysteriously disappeared. This leak occurred during a time when abortion activists are attempting to challenge Wisconsin’s 1849 law, which protects unborn babies from abortion. The leaked document suggested that the court would consider a case brought by Planned Parenthood, which performs over 300,000 abortions annually across the nation.
Planned Parenthood is attempting to establish the killing of unborn babies as a right protected by the state constitution, despite Wisconsin’s 1849 law that has safeguarded unborn children for generations.
The leaked document seems designed to generate public pressure and create momentum for abortion advocates as they seek to persuade activist judges to bypass the will of the people and Wisconsin’s longstanding protections for unborn children.
Attorney General Josh Kaul has a separate case challenging the 1849 abortion ban. A ruling in that case is still pending, but the court’s willingness to hear these cases indicates its intentions.
This is not the first time Wisconsin’s Supreme Court has been involved in controversy surrounding Justice Ann Walsh Bradley. In 2011, Bradley accused then-Justice David Prosser of choking her, which led to a politically charged investigation. The Sauk County district attorney ultimately declined to file charges after reviewing the evidence.
The pattern is evident: left-leaning justices on Wisconsin’s Supreme Court have consistently found themselves at the center of controversy. The recent leak concerning the Planned Parenthood case further undermines the court’s credibility.
The court has yet to schedule a date for oral arguments regarding the case that was mentioned in the leaked memo. However, the leak itself demonstrates the extreme measures that abortion supporters may take to advance their agenda.
This is egregious behaviour by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. This isn’t a blemish; this is an outright subversion of trust. When the Governor, the State Supreme Court, and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, who oversees schools, are all dangerously to the left of reality, insanity and injustice rule the day.
Because of their election choices, Wisconsin’s future is precarious, and their sad example should serve as a warning to everyone who enters a voting booth.
