Defending Islam Amid The Comforts Of Christianity

I have just seen this:

“British content creator Joe Collins shared why he feels most secure in Muslim social settings, pointing to the UK’s tense and often volatile drinking culture. He noted that alcohol-centered environments frequently escalate into conflict, creating spaces that are unsafe to be in.”

Stuff like this makes me feel physically sick.

I understand that Third World savages hate us and consider us less than animals.

From birth they have had evil instructions and evil examples, especially those from war torn nations.

And entire cultures have been shaped by the instructions of a 7th century child raping psychopath who was one of the most evil human beings in all of history. Fifteen centuries of those vile lessons.

This is why EX Muslims are a miracle of human sanity and decency. Their courage and mental fortitude has my immediate respect.

But with white people who embrace or defend Islam I feel the exact opposite. These were people who had every chance to know how evil this creed is. They were not born in its clutches. They don’t have their entire family ready to disown or harm them if they leave it. They have a better and far more civilised culture and history to look to.

They could for example condemn drunkenness and anti social behaviour as Christians, or as responsible adults, or as people possesed of traditional English virtues of politeness, respectable behaviour, and self control.

There’s no need to embrace the world’s most disgusting and abusive creed to create safety or to reject public disorder. And to do so when that alleged ‘safety’ is a hideous joke, when it’s not safe at all but an environment in which child rape is commonplace and terrorism is plotted and planned, to ignore the abuse going on in the background of that sick culture (including the abuse of their own women and children) is morally obscene.

But this is what whites who defend Islam do, whether they are Labour Party voters and Green voters and Lib Dem voters, whether they are ‘content creators’or converts, whether they are Owen Jones or King Charles or Kier Starmer. All of these white excusors and apologists for Islam are servile, grotesque, submissive fools and losthsome traitors to their own people, nation, culture and history.

The mass rape of our children should have been a wake up call whereby white apologies for Islam became obviously treasonous and morally grotesque. The pure savagery of October 7th should have reaffirmed an older understanding of the difference between civilisation and barbarism, and of the need to always side with civilisation. All of the craven dishonesty of ‘light a candle’ and ‘don’t let it take away our unity’ and ‘love and compassion to our wonderful Muslims’ should have been exposed as the abject, dishonest, suicidally self-destructive cant and bullshit it has always been.

I admire any Muslim who has the courage and dignity to leave that revolting and barbaric belief system, which like Communism or Nazism has only ever offered harm to humanity.

But westerners and white people who were born free of it and then go ahead and choose it and defend it? They have no excuses. They decided to embrace barbarism.

If someone is possessed of an Orientalist xenophilia, which itself is pretty sad given the wonders of European and British past achievements, they could look to Confucianism or Buddhism. They could embrace Japanese Shinto or Jain teachings or read the Hindu’s Bhagavid Gita. All these have some store of wisdom with little or no comnection to atrocities in the Far East or the Indian subcontinent. They could practice Tai-Chi or craft bonsai trees or hang around in New Age stores looking for statues of the Buddha. At least there’s some worth in these things, and little harm.

But to look at all the world’s civilisations and say “that’s the one I like….the one with the terrorism and child rape” is like asking for a snuff movie on your satellite downloads. You could have picked anything else that still exists and it would have been morally better.

There’s so much dishonesty in pretending that Islam is normal and respectable, just as there is in doing the same with its secular equivalents, Communism and Nazism. It’s not coincidental that Hitler was a socialist who admired Islam:

“Under the guidance of the Reich, Europe would speedily have become unified. Once the Jewish poison had been eradicated, unification would have been an easy matter. France and Italy, each defeated in turn at an interval of a few months by the two Germanic Powers, would have been well out of it. Both would have had to renounce their inappropriate aspirations to greatness. At the same time they would have had to renounce their pretensions in North Africa and the Near East; and that would have allowed Europe to pursue a bold policy of friendship towards Islam.”

And:

“You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?”

So there it is, the modern progressive or leftist defender of Islam is closer to Hitler’s thinking than any rightwing person is, which explains too the ease with which they accept the atrocities of Islamic groups like Hamas.