A Recent Capture Should Remind America of Benghazi and the Forgotten Trail of Evidence Leading to Hillary Clinton

Americans had largely become desensitized to the many scandals and rampant corruption we’d seen in our nation’s capital for many years. Whether the conversation is centered around Whitewater, Benghazi, or Iran-Contra, the country has come to expect a large scandal every several years in Washington, with the establishment in control of both parties. When the disgusting reality of the failed security precautions, inept response, and cover-up in Benghazi occurred, Barack Obama was very lucky that the now-failing legacy media had enough power to largely cover up the appalling actions his administration took both during that day and in the aftermath of those events as well.

There is very clear evidence that the leaders in the power structure knew right away that the terrorist attack on Benghazi that occurred just months before the 2012 election was not a protest. The best documentation of this fact is that Hillary even emailed her daughter soon after this assault on the Libyan compound to tell her that the attack was a terrorist one. Clinton did her usual song and dance, letting Susan Rice and others go on the morning shows that week and lie about the attack being a protest, of course, was careful to set up fall people to cover up her clear role in the actual incident and attempts to whitewash events. Still, with the pathetic legacy media doing Obama and Clinton’s dirty work, Romney was largely an incompetent candidate, and the result of the 2012 election, Benghazi was largely forgotten by most Americans after Barack Obama was reelected.

The recent capture of the alleged mastermind of the attack, Zubayar al-Bakoush, on Benghazi brings this story back to light, and this Clinton-led cover-up is still very relevant today. Indeed, the evidence of what really likely happened nearly 13 years ago in the now broken and forgotten nation of Libya remains very important. The evidence of what really transpired in Benghazi actually paints a much darker and more sinister story than what the media covered. Even though the State Department and US Ambassador Stevens were ostensibly in charge of the Libyan compound, the CIA was operating out of the facility as well. This is a known fact because one of the annexes was much of the right occurred was controlled by that agency. Obama had signed an executive order banning the CIA from holding prisoners because of the revelations surrounding enhanced interrogation methods under Bush, but all that happened was the agency transferred these people being held to facilities that, on paper, were controlled by other agencies, such as the State Department. General Patreus’s mistress, who was writing his memoirs, also claimed the CIA was holding prisoners at annexes in the Benghazi region.

There is also clear evidence that the CIA was using the Benghazi facility as an institution to traffic guns to groups involved in the US-led coup to remove Gaddafi, as well as to other groups that have connections to Western intelligence, such as ISIS. Obama had many opportunities to wipe out ISIS, but he did not. This terrorist group was also involved in trying to overthrow Assad, an effort, again, the US unsuccessfully supported during the failed former President’s second term. Even the New York Times reported that Libyan arms were falling into the hands of Jihadis by some, of course, bizarre coincidence.

The hit on Ambassador Stevens was as carefully coordinated as this attack was meticulously planned, and the evidence suggests the killers had insider knowledge about the compound these murderers successfully breached. The disgraceful and deliberate delay in response to the attack in Benghazi also shows complicity in a cover-up at the highest levels. Many of the Clintons’ political enemies have mysteriously died over the years, and the evidence in this case suggests that Stevens and his diplomatic team had compromising evidence on Hillary, who spearheaded the effort to remove Gaddafi. The failed former Presidential candidate had a lot to fear if Stevens started talking about arms trafficking done by her state department to known terrorist groups who hate America, and she was likely very happy to know the Ambassador did not survive the mysteriously well-coordinated attack in Benghazi.

One of the main reasons why President Trump won the 2016 election against not just Hillary, but a failed political establishment in DC, is that the public viewed the corruption in our nation’s capital as having reached a breaking point. While much of the country had become sensitized to the constant scandals, incompetence, and lack of accountability, in Washington, Trump’s efforts to terminate the endless wars and bring transparency back to government have been welcomed by most Americans, and the unfinished investigation into what really happened at Benghazi should be no different. Indeed, as Winston Churchill once famously said during World War Two, the recent capture of Zubayar al-Bakoush, the alleged mastermind of this 2012 terrorist attack, is likely the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.