Friday, October 16, 2026
Share:

If AOC Is Really Over Woke 1.0, She Should Vote To Protect Women’s Sports



 Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants Americans to see her as the new, steady, moderate voice who can lead the increasingly radical Democratic Party. She didnโ€™t endorse the unhinged Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate, Francesca Hong, and in a recent interview with ABCโ€™s Jonathan Karl, she laughed off โ€œWoke 1.0โ€ as a crazy fad that she has long since outgrown. 

Eyeing a 2028 White House run, she now wants Americans to forget her talk of defunding the police, abolishing ICE, and insisting on terms like โ€œpregnant people.โ€ Bring any of that up now, and she says youโ€™re engaging in โ€œcancel culture.โ€

Ok, fine. AOC can prove sheโ€™s really rejected Woke 1.0โ€™s excesses by saying sheโ€™s ready to vote in favor of the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act.

The womenโ€™s sports issue is the easiest and clearest way to assess whether someone is on Team Sanity. Everyone who has not pledged allegiance to the woke cult knows that males are built to be stronger and faster than females. Itโ€™s why womenโ€™s sports exist in the first place. Separate world records are kept for men and women because menโ€™s record performances are consistently far superior to womenโ€™s. Every child knows this. Deep down, the activists insisting that men should be able to opt into becoming women for the purpose of sports know that this is fundamentally unfair too. The petite 5-foot-4-inch AOC surely knows this. Yet she, like the other woke radicals, decided that she cares more about trans-identifying menโ€™s feelings than she does womenโ€™s rights.

Polls consistently show that more than eight in 10 Americans believe that men should not be allowed in womenโ€™s sports. They believed this before Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White rocked the WNBA by declaring themselves eligible for the draft. Images of these massive, muscled men preparing to enter womenโ€™s competitions drive home the absurdity of denying the male athletic advantage. It would not only be unfair for these men to play against women, but dangerous. The WNBA, a league that had parroted the radical leftโ€™s โ€œtrans women are women,โ€ is now scrambling to come up with some eligibility criteria that would keep these men out but allow them to continue the farce that men can become women. 

AOC can help put them out of their misery and show real leadership by saying womenโ€™s sports should be for women only. This would require an explicit reversal of her previous stance. In January 2025, the House passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act, a bill that would prevent schools receiving federal funding from allowing males to compete in womenโ€™s sports, by a vote of 218 to 206. Every Republican who voted supported it. Only two Democrats did. AOC voted no.

If she were to vote yes this time, undoubtedly the dam would break among rank-and-file Democrats who desperately want to back away from the toxic position of pretending that men should be able to self-identify into womenโ€™s sports, prisons, locker rooms, and domestic violence shelters. AOC could take a step toward restoring the Democratic Partyโ€™s tarnished brand as disconnected from reality and indifferent to actual womenโ€™s safety concerns. If she votes yes on protecting womenโ€™s sports, Republicans should welcome her conversion. If she votes no, Americans can reasonably conclude that โ€œWoke 1.0โ€ isn’t dead after all.

Thatโ€™s what renouncing Woke 1.0 would look like. It has to be more than just a press strategy of laughing off yesterdayโ€™s slogans but still supporting yesterdayโ€™s radical policies. Is AOC ready to really turn the page? We will know when she says sheโ€™s ready to vote for the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. 

This article was originally published by RealClearPolitics and made available via RealClearWire.

>