Wednesday, July 02, 2025

  • The Debate was a Bloodbath, but Trump Missed Opportunities

    • I think Trump could have pulled a Gerald Ford gaffe (“There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe”), a Rick Perry gaffe, (“I can’t. The third one, I can’t. Sorry. Oops”) and sweated like Richard Nixon, and it wouldn’t have mattered. Biden’s stiff gait, hand shake to a ghost, dead eyed stare, hanging open mouth and seemingly constant brain freeze confirmed the worst fears of the electorate: The man holding the nuclear codes for the most devastating arsenal on the planet has progressive dementia.
    Those of us who have had a loved one suffering from mental decline are quick to recognize the disease, and we know the stages. It is highly probable that if he’s still alive, Joe Biden will be so significantly impaired by 2028, which would be the end of his second term, that he won’t be practically functional, let alone in a position to assume the responsibilities of the most demanding job in the world.

  • Come On, Man

    • No wonder Americans don’t know what the hell is going on. No wonder “conspiracy theorists” is even a thing. Folks, if those CNN questions representedRead More

  • Bungling Biden has Us Slip Slidin’ into WW3

    • We are on a treacherous path that can only end in global catastrophe if the U.S. continues its provocative policy. If this tit for tat escalation continues, it is only a matter of time before Putin authorizes the use of a tactical nuclear weapon in Ukraine. At that point, all bets are off. This is not the Cuban missile crisis where slow-moving ships provide leaders with days to resolve the conflict. One retaliatory hypersonic nuclear missile targeting a NATO country whose military hardware was used to attack air bases inside Russia would mean the end of humanity as we know it.

  • Good News Joe says Don’t Believe Your Lyin’ Eyes

    • So far, Slow Joe has committed $100 billion to fight human caused climate change even though we have no idea if humans are impacting the climate at all. There isn’t a single experiment that confirms human involvement in a climate that is constantly evolving. Atmospheric water vapor, increased solar activity, changes in tidal activity, lack of volcanic activity and rotational changes in the earth’s orbit are all plausible explanations for the rise in ambient and surface temperatures. Until technology advances to the point where we can apply the scientific method to the climate change puzzle, spending this kind of cash on a theory is inexcusable.
    In the meantime, wouldn’t it make more sense to apply these resources to mitigating the effects of climate change? For example, how much wildfire technology and manpower could $100 billion buy? How much flood-proofing construction could be completed for $100 billion?

>