It Shouldn’t Be A Lot To Ask

The things I believe in and want seem pretty mild to me.

I want the government to leave innocent people alone, and I want them to do a good job of dealing with guilty people, and I want them to be sane enough to know the difference between the two.

It doesn’t seem difficult to me to know that a citizen with no criminal record is different to an illegal alien who invades your country, or to know that a normal person should be dealt with differently to a child rapist.

And it shouldn’t be a lot to ask that my government considers itself to have a duty to me and other citizens and not to have a duty towards foreign institutions, foreign people, or foreign religions. It’s always seemed to me obvious that arrivals have a requirement to integrate, and that those who are already citizens don’t have a requirement to accommodate. The burden pretty obviously falls on the arrival, or else there’s no point to citizenship and nationhood at all.

Similarly it shouldn’t have been a lot to ask for parties of the Left not to hate and despise their own country and majorities, and for these parties and middle class people generally not to treat white people less affluent than themselves as worthless pieces of shit to be constantly demonised and insulted. For me, the extremism is in how white populations, particularly the working class, have been treated as their countries have been radically altered without their consent. The extremism, for me, is in wanting your people replaced, or ruled from abroad, or in getting angrier about your own people waving their flag than you get about their children being gang raped.

All that seems very extremist to me, even though it’s the mainstream atttitude from our middle classes and rulers.

Nor does it seem extreme to me for people to object to replacement and terrorism, savagery and crime from other groups. It seems reasonable to me to be honest about Islam’s record of barbarism and murder, and extreme to pretend that other faiths are running around murdering people the same way, when they aren’t.

For me, the insanities embraced by the Left are extreme,and the weakness and uselessness of the traditional parties of the Right, who refused to defend basic sanity in obvious ways, was also more extreme than my demand for some realignment and repair of the damage these others inflicted and are atill inflicting on my nation. What the parties of the Left did, and what the parties of the Right did nothing about, was extreme and vile. Noticing that is not extreme and vile.

At the same time I think you can defend white populations, restore sanity, and recognise real threats rather than imaginary ones, without becoming a batshit crazy freak who hates Jews and Israel. In fact, if you want to restore sanity, embracing ANOTHER madness is not the way to do it.

So my position is that a Kier Starmer or a Kamala Harris is actually an extremist, but so is a Feuntes or a Carlson. And in both cases this appears to be glaringly obvious to me based on the first two hating whites and endorsing Islam, and the second two hating Jews and endorsing Islam.

Just as genitally mutilating kids is extreme and freakish, supporting terrorist causes is extreme and freakish, and smugly assuming that the UN, the EU, or a narrow class of ‘experts’ have the right to take away the basic rights and representation of ordinary people is extreme and freakish too.

It seems natural to me to reject false claims of fascism, and recognise real moves towards authoritarianism, at the same time. And it bewilders me somewhat how many people are individually incapable of making these calls themselves with any accuracy, but instead rely totally on either mainstream or alternative media instruction for doing so.

But the weird reality is that my very obvious and simple requirement to others, that they not be insane cunts trying to destroy my country or me, is a requirement that virtually the whole of the respectable world, and at the same time at least half of the alternative world, can’t meet.

Surrounded by obscene extremes from all sides, extremism from Left, Right and Centre, none of whom are guiltless (the Centre, which thinks it is guiltless, is merely the most smug of the lot), the western citizen who simply asks not to be betrayed, destroyed, vilified or turned into a slave, is the one who gets called an extremist….while he sees the child rapists and the terrorists getting support.

That sane citizen ends up hating quite a few groups, but hating them perfectly rationally, and from bitter experience rather than unthinking prejudice. He hates the conservatives who refused to defend and protect his culture and people. He hates the delusional middle class, the complacent professional class, the treasonous media class, as well as the imported savages and the race grifting immigrants. Naturally and perfectly sanely, he hates the terrorists and abusers. With equal clarity, he hates those who refuse to notice which immigrants integrate and contribute, and which bomb and kill.

And having never offered violence or harm, the sane man in modern times finds himself castigated as the one from whom the violence and harm originates. He must accept being hated unjustly, or he is described as hateful himself, even more than he was when he was merely a silent victim.

But I still think it is not much to ask that we live in a patriotic country where communists are not revered, where savagery is not welcomed, and where whites and Jews don’t get constant incitement towards their murder in every classroom, bookshop, movie theatre and newsroom.

That shouldn’t be the difficult thing to ask, but is.