Wildfire Warfare? “…And We Won’t Talk About What Hit It”
I’ve written enough on the anomalies–to put it mildly–in weather and seemingly natural catastrophic events to where, likely, no new introduction is needed. Here is a passage from my latest in January:
All of that said as the latest in my continuing effort for all of us to break the spell of celebrity, hero culture, I employ Trump today–particularly his (not so) strange “weave” as he calls it concerning the California fires and his latest post on Truth Social last night.
“It looks like something hit it. And we won’t talk about what hit it.” This is a typical Trump “weave” if you follow him. He is signaling something in the story.
The post:
What could he possibly have meant by “hit it?”
Just because someone presents a “logical” string of reasons for these fires, as s/he might in a comment under a social media post, doesn’t mean there aren’t other more nefarious things tied to it. Of course there are going to be “logical” reasons for the devil to destroy. That’s how he keeps us deceived. It’s classic plausible deniability.
Add climate chaos to the “logical” reasons, and now you really keep people off the scent.
There is more here if you’d like to peruse, and these are only the ones on fires.
SEPTEMBER 2023
MAUI: “Make Oprah Eat That Ten Million.”
Right on Cue, the Establishment Shows What Maui Was All About
Guess What Was Published August 10th–In The Middle of the Maui Fires…
Maui Bursting Goes Far Beyond What Mockingbird Will Tell You -Part I &
JANUARY 2025
Trump and the California Fires
Once upon a time, we called them “acts of God.” Lightning struck, forests burned, and we rebuilt. But somewhere along the way, nature stopped behaving naturally. The fires grew stranger–hotter, faster, more selective. We were told by climate whisperers that it was the result of climate change, or climate chaos, or global warming, or something. Of course that battle continues politically between the right and the left, but the question is this–is the climate change debate a intentionally installed red herring to distract from something decidedly more human and more nefarious?
From something even more supernatural and diabolical?
I can read the room and understand that so much of this is still hard for people to consider. It’s still somewhat hard for me. But there’s enough evidence out there to make you at least take pause.
Some of it was discussed on Tucker Carlson’s recent show. Here is one small snippet.
Could these fires be less about mismanagement and more about manipulation? Could “climate crisis” itself be the perfect cover for weaponized weather?
If the atmosphere becomes a battlefield, the fires stop being “wild.”
They become controlled, as if something “hit it,” as if Trump’s words “And we won’t talk about what hit it” may indeed point to something we do need to start talking about.
