Bizarro World: German Court Chastises Girl For Misgendering Trans Thing That Raped Her
In the “You can’t make it up category,” a German court reprimanded a 15-year-old rape victim for misgendering her attacker. In 2024, Germany passed a ridiculous law that could result in a 10,000-euro (11,000+ U.S.) fine for “misgendering.” First of all, there’s no such thing as a transgender. These are mentally ill people, and Germany has decided that if you don’t play along with their sickness, you may be fined.
In this case, one of these disturbed fools decided to rape one of his friend’s daughters in a restaurant bathroom. The man pretending to be female is a 55-year-old former federal officer from Rosenheim named Maja Schmid.
Reduxx first reported the case about the crime that occurred in August of 2025. During a road trip, the young girl and Schmid stopped at a roadside restaurant. Schmid approached her in the women’s bathroom, pushed her against the wall, and proceeded to rape her.
After the attack, it has been reported that the girl was in shock and could not respond until Schmid left the area; she then suffered a “serious anxiety attack” while still in the bathroom.
While the crime itself is abhorrent, the conduct by this monster’s lawyer, the judge presiding over the case, and even the German media is indefensible. All seem hell-bent on punishing the young girl further.
Let’s start with the bleeding-heart liberal media. Throughout the trial, the media often described Schmid as a “police woman,” or “female police officer,” with Süddeutsche Zeitung saying the case was an example of a “female” sex crime.
The article stated:
“Statistically speaking, women are significantly in the minority as perpetrators in cases of this kind, but women, too, can be violent, can inflict sexual violence on others, and can commit rape. Even as police officers.”
How irresponsible is it for any type of media to go along with this piece of sh*t’s delusion? He pinned a 15-year-old girl against the wall of a public bathroom and raped her. Then BR24 Bavaria had the BALLS (Pun Intended) to report that Schmid was “subjected to particular hardship due to sometimes defamatory media coverage and her placement in the men’s section of Munich Prison.”
He’s a man, you morons!
Besides, as it turns out, even the men’s section of the jail is too good for him; he should be in a kennel that only gets cleaned monthly.
By the way, it was also revealed that at the time of the assault, Schmid was already under investigation by cybercrime specialists for possessing extreme pornography on his phone. During the investigation, police seized his devices and discovered thousands of child sex abuse images, some featuring toddlers, as well as a video of Schmid sexually abusing a dog. However, the court did not consider the bestiality material in its verdict. According to the presiding judge, bestiality pornography in Germany is only punishable if it is intended for distribution.
Next, Peter Durr, the lawyer for this despicable freak, according to Die Welt, during the trial, sent an official letter from his office questioning the teenage rape victim over her use of male pronouns for her rapist during her testimony. Dürr said he was looking to “politely inquire whether it is correct that you referred to Ms. Schmid as ‘he’ on the last day of proceedings.”
The young girl responded to this asinine letter by insisting that she had had absolutely no intention of “misgendering” her rapist. Speaking to Welt, the girl said that Schmid is a “biological man, a trans woman. But this trans woman has raped someone,” adding that Schmid is a “threat to other women.”
The implementation of the 2024 law raised concerns on social media, particularly because some saw Schmid’s lawyer’s letter as an act of intimidation. The letter suggested that the victim could face repercussions under the new legislation if she did not retract her use of male pronouns when referring to her attacker.
Angered by the recent revelation, several German women’s rights activists initiated a digital campaign with a very clear message:
“We live in a country where a raped girl receives a cease-and-desist order if she refers to her rapist as a man. I condemn everyone who supported this humiliating and misogynistic law.”
Amen!
Then there is the judge and the German justice system as a whole. In 2024, a year before he raped this young girl, Schmid had invited the teenage victim to his home to use his whirlpool system. According to the girl, Schmid gave her alcohol, and after about five minutes, she began to feel dizzy and soon lost consciousness. She later awoke hours later on Schmid’s sofa, in the dark, wearing only a T-shirt and with her bathing suit removed. Schmid claimed he changed her out of her bathing suit because she was at risk of drowning and to keep his couch dry.
Despite the obvious, the prosecution concluded there was not enough evidence to charge Schmid with any crime related to this incident. Most concerningly, Judge Bartschmid, in his sentencing remarks, stated that the minor “shared responsibility” for what happened because she had consumed alcohol.
After ignoring the obvious and letting this pig off with no consequences, just a year later, this same judge only sentenced Schmid to 3 years and 3 months. Trying to explain this gross miscarriage of justice in a rape case, Bartschmidt said that he took into account a letter of apology Schmid had written and his commitment to pay the victim €11,000 in compensation.
Then this outrageous statement.
In his sentencing remarks, Judge Andreas Bartschmid made one of the stupidest declarations ever. Despite the fact that Schmid had raped a child and possessed an extensive collection of child pornography, the judge stated that Schmid was “not a pedophile.”
Bartschmid further asserted that Schmid’s gender transition was “not a fetish,” describing it instead as a deep-rooted inclination within the defendant. Additionally, the judge claimed that the teenage victim had suffered “no long-lasting effects” from the assault that took place at the motorway service station, only experiencing physical pain during the incident.
Naturally, this simpleton’s statement didn’t sit well with the victim. She told Welt that she had suffered tremendous psychological harm from the assault.
“If the judge had seen me outside the courtroom on the day I gave my statement, having panic attacks because I was supposed to testify in the same room as Maja, he would have realized that I had suffered harm.”
Nothing says ignorance like the three-headed grouping of a clueless lawyer, judge, and a lying MSM. That combination screams nightmare, and this is the reality of social injustice that we are all facing.
A young girl is raped by a mental patient, and instead of supporting the 15-year-old victim, they support the freak who violated her.
This has to change, and when it does, the radical left brought it on themselves.
