Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Share:

Ukraine and the Glass Slipper



For three years, the West has been spoon-fed a tidy little fairy tale about Ukraine: a small but plucky democracy heroically fighting off Russian aggression, standing on the front lines of โ€œfreedomโ€ against tyranny.

Everyone likes a good Cinderella story, in March and all the other months too.

Itโ€™s been a good storyโ€”one thatโ€™s kept billions in taxpayer dollars flowing, weapons shipments rolling, and the military-industrial complex humming along. It is a story I have covered at length and through many seemingly disconnected events.

And the latest question is this: Is the New York Timesโ€”of all outletsโ€”finally confirming what so many of us have been saying, what the Trump-Putin alliance has long seemed to suggest?

What if we told you that the whole time, amidst the great Mockingbird coverup, Ukraine wasnโ€™t calling the shots in its own war? According a new report, it wasn’t just NATO arming Ukraine–it was NATO running the war.

They werenโ€™t just supplying weapons.

Putin has been saying this all alongโ€”which is why I put out so much work analyzing his interview with Tucker Carlson in February 2024. And saying that doesn’t force anyone to hop over to Tribe B and Russians either.

Besides, did we really think our government was going to trust the comedic actor also known as Zelenskyy with all those stolen taxpayer dollars?

According to The Telegraph, British commandos and the CIA have been deeply embedded in Ukraineโ€™s war effort from the beginning.

They were evacuating Ukrainian generals from Kyiv, helping them relocate to secure locations where they could be โ€œadvisedโ€ by Western intelligence. They were setting up a shadow war room where Ukrainian military leaders coordinated with US and British operativesโ€”effectively taking orders from their new handlers.

And that was just the start.

Within two months of the war breaking out, Ukrainian commanders were secretly flown to US bases in Germany, where they received direct training and intelligence from American military officials.

But waitโ€”if Ukraine is supposedly an independent nation fighting for its survival, why do its generals need to be smuggled out of their own country and placed under Western โ€œguidanceโ€ to make decisions?

Who is really running this war?

As has been my way lately, here is a link to much of my recent work for additional context. There’s no way to repeat it all, but you can skim through some of this:

A Proxy War

For years, Western politicians have sworn up and down that NATO forces arenโ€™t directly involved in the fighting. Theyโ€™ve called anyone who suggested otherwise a โ€œconspiracy theorist.โ€

Ah, that ever-increasingly popular mean name. Like being called a racist or an antisemite.

Turns out, they were lying.

Of course they were lying.

Because if indeed, as the left-heavy NY Times article purports, you had British special forces sneaking Ukrainian leadership out of Kyiv, if you had US military bases serving as de facto Ukrainian command centers, if you had Western intelligence agencies dictating strategyโ€”well, thatโ€™s no longer just support.โ€ Thatโ€™s direct involvement.

Itโ€™s not like the NY Times wasnโ€™t telling us this long before March 2025.

So is it within the realm of possibility to drop the charade, finally, especially after the narrative has taken the turn it has in recent weeks with Trump, Putin, and Zelenskyy, not to mention our European โ€œalliesโ€? Can we stop treating Ukraine like innocent little bystanders, when thereโ€™s a much bigger story at play here?

This isnโ€™t Ukraineโ€™s war.

This is a globalist war against a sovereign nation, an overly proud one perhaps, fought through Ukrainian bodies.

It was actually Putin and Russia who had the restraint not to escalate.

And there is nothing new about this news.

The Fake News Cover-Up

Of course, you didnโ€™t hear any of this from Mockingbird all along.

The reason should be clear. The same corporate outlets that sold us โ€œweapons of mass destructionโ€ in Iraq were instructed by their overlords to sell us โ€œUkraine is winning and we have to stop this monstrous Putin advance and by the way weโ€™ll need billions more of your tax dollars to do itโ€ propaganda.

The goal is never truth. The goal is always power, control, and on our endโ€”obedience. It is why my work takes a bit of a unique approach in typically challenging readers to engage with the story as it happens. Risk the questions. Risk being wrong.

The alternative is to have the history books written for usโ€”those same books your children are โ€œlearningโ€ history from as we speak.

So yes, the NY Times had to retreat a bit in the narrative war (for whatever reason), they had to admitโ€”much too lateโ€”that the globalist regime has been directly controlling Ukraineโ€™s war effort from the shadows. But even as they reported it, they spun it into a feel-good story about Western โ€œhelp.โ€

Help?

Since when is using another country as cannon fodder considered help?

And letโ€™s not forget about all the fake stories that had to be walked back, like the โ€œGhost of Kyivโ€ or any number of โ€œRussian attacksโ€ that were actually conducted by Ukraine, or more aptly, NATO.

Itโ€™s been lie after lie after lie, all designed to keep public opinion in line and the war machine running, not to mention the highway robbery of American taxdollars alive and well.

Is this any different from any number of stories we all have seethed over through the years?

But hereโ€™s where it gets interesting.

The cracks in the narrative are starting to show.

According to The Telegraph, the real reason for NATOโ€™s deep involvement in Ukraine isnโ€™t just to โ€œhelp.โ€ Itโ€™s because Western military leaders donโ€™t trust Zelenskyy or his inner circle to make strategic decisions on their own.

So is it to help, or is it something else?

Do you see the cracks? Have you ever watched a narcissistโ€™s carefully constructed facade start to crumble?

Think about that.

Similar to what one โ€œBurning Brightโ€ likes to say, retreat in the narrative war is a battle victory for the truth.

The same mediaโ€”that spent two years ignoring Zelenskyyโ€™s comedic acting past and worshiping him as a Churchillian hero–is now quietly admitting heโ€™s nothing more than a figurehead, a puppet whose strings are being pulled by foreign handlers.

And it makes sense, doesnโ€™t it? Didnโ€™t we see first hand an illustration of this in the Oval Office with Zelenskyy and Trump just last month?

If you were a NATO general waging a high-stakes proxy war against Russia, would you really entrust your entire strategy to a former comedian with no military experience? Would you really let a corrupt government with a long history of laundering money and arms smuggling dictate the pace of your operations?

Whatโ€™s Next for Ukraine?

Now that the truth is breaking through beyond just the conspiratorially theoretical level, the big question is: What happens next?

Because letโ€™s be honestโ€”Ukraine isnโ€™t winning this war. They were never going to win it, and now with Trump at the helm it most certainly wonโ€™t happen.

Despite all the weapons, all the intelligence, and all the mercenaries posing as โ€œvolunteers,โ€ Ukraine has been losing and losing big. Its army has long been exhausted, its manpower has long been in shambles, and its Western backers have long been getting nervous.

So what do the globalists do when their puppet canโ€™t hold the line?

It does what itโ€™s always done: It finds a new puppet.

Or, in the worldโ€™s case as it stands, it either redirects or bolsters its focus on the Middle East.

Weโ€™ve already seen rumors of a possible coup against Zelenskyy circulating. Weโ€™ve already seen NATO openly discussing the possibility of deploying troops to โ€œstabilizeโ€ the situation. And weโ€™ve already seen cracks in the allianceโ€”not all of Europe is as gung-ho about continued support as they once were.

Could Ukraine be thrown under the bus? Could NATO pivot to a new strategy?

The answer to that depends on one thing:

How much more are the Western elites willing to risk?

Because theyโ€™ve bet big on this war. Theyโ€™ve staked their reputations, their credibility, and their long-term plans for global dominance on the idea that Russia could be broken, isolated, and ultimately replaced with a compliant government.

But that hasnโ€™t happened.

Russia hasnโ€™t collapsed.

If anything, itโ€™s stronger than everโ€”economically, militarily, and diplomatically. And now it seems they have Trump and this rebranded version of America as an allyโ€”the story about Trump being โ€œpissed offโ€ at Putin this week notwithstanding.

This mayโ€”and I stress may because none of this is cut and dryโ€”leave NATO with three choices:

  1. Admit failure and cut its lossesโ€”which would be humiliating.
  2. Double down and escalateโ€”which would be catastrophic.
  3. Combine 1 and 2 and focus more earnestlyโ€”from a narrative standpoint in the โ€œnewsโ€–on peddling to the American people a regional war in the Middle East

If history has taught us anything, itโ€™s that when empires are faced with these choicesโ€ฆ

They usually choose escalation.

The Endgame and the Real War

As everyone should know by now, this isnโ€™t just about Ukraine–especially since this article doesn’t even get into its human trafficking and biolabs issues.

Itโ€™s also not about switching teams and going all in for Putin and Russia. They have their own skeletons.

Itโ€™s about something bigger on a geopolitical stage, yes, but this all has to do with eternal matters as well. Itโ€™s about the vipers who control the flow of informationโ€”the media, the intelligence agencies, the corporate overlordsโ€”and how they manipulate reality to suit their interests. And manipulating reality means assaulting the truth, the Eighth Commandmentโ€”Truth capitalized himself.

Itโ€™s about how wars are sold to the public, how lies are dressed up as truth, how nations are turned into battlegrounds for power games they never signed up for, how sin is made into a shiny new jewel piece.

If weโ€™ve learned anything from the last few years, itโ€™s that the people running the show donโ€™t stop unless theyโ€™re forced to. They didnโ€™t stop with Iraq. They didnโ€™t stop with Libya. They didnโ€™t stop with Covid or its adjacent fake vaccine.

They will not stop here.

Because war isnโ€™t just profitableโ€”itโ€™s the ultimate tool of control. It drains nations, crushes dissent, and keeps the people too exhausted to resist. And thatโ€™s why they need you to believe the next lie. And the next. And the next.

But hereโ€™s the thing about lies: They only work when people believe them. They only work when the people stop keeping the ultimate Truth at the center of their lives, at the center of society.

The Ukraine narrative is cracking. The Covid lies have collapsed. And if that trend continues, the people pulling the strings are going to have a problem. So the question isโ€”do we stop here? Do we just move on, let them pivot to another war, another hoax, another deception?

Or do we press forward? Do we bring Truth into our lives like never before, as though our lives–as though the eternity of our loved one–depended on it?

Because if we really learned our lesson from Covidโ€”if we really understand whatโ€™s at stake and why all of this connectsโ€”then we know the answer.

We fight.

We fight for our families. We fight for reality. We fight for Truth himself.

We fight as Cinderella against all odds.

And we simply donโ€™t let them win.


May everyone named directly or referenced indirectly ask forgiveness and do penance for their sins against America and God. I fight this information war in the spirit of justice and love for the innocent, but I have been reminded of the need for mercy and prayers for our enemies. I am a sinner in need of redemption as well after all, for my sins are many. In the words of Jesus Christ himself, Lord forgive us all, for we know not what we do.